When do you expect One More Day will be undone?

[Alan2099]

It'll happen sometimes inbetween them undoing Gwen Stacy's death and them retconning Peter's parents as spies.

And the very next issue we'll find out who FACADE really is!

[CaptainUniverse]

It'll happen sometimes inbetween them undoing Gwen Stacy's death and them retconning Peter's parents as spies.

And the very next issue we'll find out who FACADE really is!

Gwen Stacy came back earlier in Wells' run and was then murdered again by a Celestial, which is as it should be. Peter's parents...eh...that's never getting retconned, One More Day will get retconned first.

F.A.C.A.D.E. was the friends we made along the way.

[Kevinroc]

It'll happen sometimes inbetween them undoing Gwen Stacy's death and them retconning Peter's parents as spies.

And the very next issue we'll find out who FACADE really is!

Peter's parents being spies makes so much more sense when you realize it was Stan's commentary on The Rosenbergs, which was absolutely a big thing in Jewish communities in Stan's day.

(But Marvel will never admit Peter was Jewish.)

[Lee]

What is meant by "until Spider-Man is fully public domain"? Marvel will always be making new Spider-Man stories and adding new things to the mythos. There will always be decades of the most recent Spider-Man stories completely inaccessible to the public domain.

When Spider-Man and Mary Jane do become public domain Disney aren't going to allow major publishers infringe upon their non-public domain stories. Peter and Mary Jane being married is a a story development introduced in Amazing Spider-Man Annual #21. You'll be waiting until 2083 for that to become public domain. If someone wants to publish a story that "undoes" One More Day, they'll have to wait until 2103 for One More Day to become public domain, otherwise they can't use anything from that story.

It's a dead end. Fan fiction already exists, enjoy that instead.

[Mister Mets]

When Marvel decides they’re not worried about the long term future of the 616 Spider-Man.

[Mister Mets]

Peter's parents being spies makes so much more sense when you realize it was Stan's commentary on The Rosenbergs, which was absolutely a big thing in Jewish communities in Stan's day.

(But Marvel will never admit Peter was Jewish.)

This is the first time I’ve heard this theory. A complication is that they were clearly guilty.

[Kevinroc]

This is the first time I’ve heard this theory. A complication is that they were clearly guilty.

Indeed. But Jewish communities didn't accept that in the 1960s, in the days Stan was writing ASM.

I think Marvel trying to put some distance between the Rosenbergs and Spider-Man is totally understandable.

[ARkadelphia]

OMD will be done when Peter decides it’s okay to be in love with his sister.

[Lukmendes]

OMD will be done when Peter decides it’s okay to be in love with his sister.

And then he'll marry Teresa instead.

[Hoodj]

Never, because that would imply Marvel sees Spiderman as anything more than a brand and a marketing immortal figure that offers anything more to them than being popular to children and nerds that self insert as him in shipping.

[Kaitou D. Kid]

Interesting results we got so far. Two thirds think Marvel will never budge until they literally lose monopoly on the character, while the remaining third think the chances are stronger that it might be undone in the next few years.

[Hoodj]

When it comes to major iconic heroes like Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, and Wonder Woman... the mainstream media absolutely cares what happens when there is a major historic event.

These are all the events that were reported by the mainstream media in the last 35 years alone:

Spider-Man's wedding
The Death of Superman
Spider-Man's unmasking in Civil War
Wonder Woman getting a new costume (2010)
Superman renouncing his American citizenship
Action Comics restarting from #1 (2011)
The debut of Miles Morales

ASM #1000 will undoubtedly catch their attention. Not only is it Spider-Man, the company's flagship book... it will also be the first Marvel book in history to reach that number.

This just could mean Spider-Man gets a futher reboot back to when hes a teenager, you ever thought that? Peters most iconic thing about him is the first arcs of his life as young hero and being a growing teen. Not his marriage.

[Spider-Tiger]

This just could mean Spider-Man gets a futher reboot back to when hes a teenager, you ever thought that? Peters most iconic thing about him is the first arcs of his life as young hero and being a growing teen. Not his marriage.

They're not going to make ASM 1000 a hard reboot. A big "finale" to a new #1 perhaps.

Regardless, I've been saying that they should just hard reboot Amazing Spider-man for years now. Not a half-assed reboot like BND. Why bother with a sprawling continuity if the continuity is constantly ignored and/or mucked up?

[WebLurker]

If it happens (big if), I'm guessing closer to the 2040s than not. Current management is vehemently anti-marriage (so far as 616 comics are concerned), come hell or high water. If it's going to come back, I think that's going to mean some kind of corporate shakeup or a new generation of creatives taking charge. This all started because members of the brass wanted the comics to revolve around a specific version of Spider-Man, so it seems to follow that that's the only way it gets undone.

When Marvel decides they’re not worried about the long term future of the 616 Spider-Man.

Don't get it.

Interesting results we got so far. Two thirds think Marvel will never budge until they literally lose monopoly on the character, while the remaining third think the chances are stronger that it might be undone in the next few years.

Guess that's the optimists and pessimists on the forum. To be fair to the former, the Marvel brass have repeatedly said time and again that they will not budge and that Spider-Man must remain "pure." In the case of the latter, the backlash and rejection of the post-OMD status quo still being a thing shows that Marvel's attempts to erase the marriage and move on from things haven't been totally successful and there has been an uptick of stuff that treats it with respect (saying the marriage is only an AU-worthy thing might not be much better, but more than I would've expected only a few years ago).

Long story short, I think the fans overestimate the amount of influence they have on Marvel, while Marvel's current Spider-Man agenda is based on the faulty assumption that the marriage isn't an essential element to the franchise and lore, hence why it appears that it could go either way. Mileage may vary.

[Spider-Tiger]

Don't get it.

He's saying that whomever chooses to undo OMD must buy into the logic that marriage is bad for the book's longevity. And has therefore decided that longevity is no longer a concern when reinstating the marriage.

When in reality, those who decide to undo OMD and reinstate the marrige might just disagree with that logic in the first place. Not all creatives share the same opinions.