Sampere's Wonder Woman is too masculine looking. I hope King isn't going to minimize Diana's femininity as that's core to the character. Its what seperates WW from a generic warrior character.
Masculinity (a vague, up-for-interpretation term anyway) is what separates WW from a generic warrior character? I thought her Themysciran backstory, her compassion, kind heart, and inherent reluctance to decapitate/disembowel/spinerip her way through her enemies was what separated her from the garden-variety "badass warrior chicks" that so many fanboys love.
I like what I’ve seen so far from Sampere. Diana looks fit, broad shoulders. He draws her hair well and while I don’t love the more “armor-y” boots, I do like the white stripe there. Face kinda small as others have pointed out but overall I do like Sampere’s take. Hoping she also looks taller in comparison.
“Look, you can’t put the Superman #77s with the #200s. They haven’t even discovered Red Kryptonite yet. And you can’t put the #98s with the #300s, Lori Lemaris hasn’t even been introduced.” — Sam
“Where the hell are you from? Krypton?” — Edgar Frog
I think Daniel Sampere is a helluva artist. The critiques are fine, but I also think they're overblown.
I don't think "masculine" is the right adjective, "unglamorous" fits better. There are no frills, no thrills and she looks like a corn-fed volleyball player from Idaho. She doesn't go to Coachella or drink dirty martinis, she goes to Branson, Missouri for country/western music and Bud Light.
In this post-Instagram world we live in with rampant BBL's and boob jobs, where cashiers at the grocery store wear contoured make-up, lace front wigs and fake eyelashes so long they can barely see past them, it's a little jarring and overly quaint.
Christ, the whinging already.
Sampere’s WW is pretty great actually. Nice change of pace from the Paquette covers and rotating artists we’ve had for the past year.
Last edited by Gaius; 04-19-2023 at 08:12 PM.
You goshdarn right, I love Paquette!
WW PACQUETTE EARTH 1.jpg