"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
Disagree.
Characters of marginalized backgrounds (gender, race, orientation, disability, etc) get shelved or undone all the time in comix.
John Henry Irons went from super-prominent to damn near forgotten.
Barbara Gordon went from disabled to able-bodied.
If DC could and did weather those PR backlashes, it can do the same with Jon.
Don't think DC won't do a move because of bad optics when they have a proven track record of doing just that.
Yeah, that's something missing in a good superhero story these days. The actual civilian aspect of these characters. Regardless of how I feel about Snapper in the 1960s JLA, he did provide some sense of ordinariness. What about the employee of Bruce's company? I know PKJ is going to emphasis the Daily Planet crew, but I think he should do away with it entirely. There's so much you can do with Clark as a reporter these days instead of writing papers for the Daily Planet. What about Diana? She's so caught up in Gods, Gods, and more Gods, we hardly get any interactions with regular people. A lot of stories can be pulled from the focusing on Bruce Wayne, Diana prince, Clark Kent, Hal Jordan, etc.
That is why elements like secret identities exists: to make the hero to interact more with the people from the street, to have a life beyond the suit and to show they are not only a bright costume.
I thought than with Bendis we will see more iof Clark Kent.
Big mistake.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
I hope not. From reading the comments, though, I guess I'm in the minority. I hate legacy-villains (make me feel like the hero isn't thought worthy an original villain of their own and like creators are out of ideas) and am not real fond of legay-allies, though I do end up liking some. I don't want spinoffs with other spinoff characters all the time. I don't need the same families having interactions with each other each generation (and especially not the same interpersonal dynamics repeated). Sure, I've ended up liking some, but I'd much rather they go another route. I just feel like surrouding Jon with spinoffs of characters that Clark was surrounded with lessens his distinctiveness. Yeah, I hated his Legion involvement and Kon living on the farm, too. Same reason.
When Jon came out as bisexual and his same-sex kiss cover dropped that whole event was pretty damn big in the mainstream media as I recall. The headline "DC does away with Bisexual Superman" would go over poorly I think. So, Jon has an extra layer of protection against removal Chris didn't.
"So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."
I know it got a ton of publicity, but there's been nothing since then. And honestly, it confused a number of more casual fans wondering why Clark was skinnier and not with Lois (it was advertised as "SUPERMAN" not "Jon Kent Superman"), again. Until it was pointed out that this was Clark's son. Which in itself raised more questions.