The original storyline’s conclusion is what differentiates Bobbi from a lot of other heroes. The brainwashing is icky but it is treated as such and she lets the ******* die for what he did to her. One of my favourite scenes in comics.
I eagerly await the day that characters are allowed to have new storylines, because I'm so damn tired of Bobbi and Phantom Rider
It's been awhile since I read that, but my impression wasn't that it retconned the rape, but it retconned Clints motivation for divorcing her to not believing it was rape, with the "you let him die" just being used as a pretense (Which is a whole different questionable creative choice.)
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
Last edited by Thor-Ul; 04-09-2023 at 12:35 PM.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
Definitely agree. They do need to move forward and stop with all the retcons. I don't think they need to completely forget what came before...just not rely so heavily on it moving forward. I do think there are situations that might call for using it..like if Bobbi was to encounter a women who had been through a similar experience and talking about getting through it. But Phantom Rider's ghost should not be showing up every 2nd or 3rd story with Bobbi as a lead.
Back to the original premise though. It was a bad retcon. I think it is disrespectful. And it makes Bobbi look really bad.
Last edited by Chris0013; 04-09-2023 at 06:41 PM.
All I wanted was to be unconditionally loved while never having to work on my flaws. Is that so much to ask?
I hate that retcon. Worst thing you can have done to the character.
I was like… “maybe it’s not that bad,” but those panels are truly damning. Making your own decisions has nothing to do with being drugged and taken advantage of. Also it makes Clint look really icky too because he’d rather believe in a reality where his wife was taken of advantage of than a reality where she wanted to be with someone else.
Also if this retcon is trying to give Bobbi her agency back and say she owned her decisions, then the fact that Clint had to divorce HER just makes her look awful because she should be taking accountability and ending the relationship herself after having an affair.
Those pages make Bobbi look delusional. I don't see Clint lying to himself, I see Bobbi missing the point and misconstruing what he's saying to downplay her flaws. So her saying "Well Clint lied to himself lol" comes off as her just making her own little headcanon, just to downplay the blame and make it about HIS issues.
Likely not what the writer intended, but it has those vibes lmao
I think we should look the context of the story. It was about the time of Civil War 2 and Clint was just being judged, and cleared from the Hulk homicide. We can leave the how and why of the Hulk killing outside of the discussion because the important is the result of the trial. And now what is coming is my own speculation:
I think than Chelsea Cain was trying to send a feminist message by comparing the situation of Clint with the situation of Bobbi. On how why Bobbi by killing a man was more hardly jugded than Clint for the same act. Clint, a man, was cleared from the act but Bobbi was judged harshly for the same act.
However how the situation was presented compared to the original events, well, it really leaves Mockingbird on a uncomfortable place. Or Bobbi willingly cheated her husband and later left his lover to die, but tried to hide it, or suddendly is in an state of denial of the events. Can that kind of situation even possible? Is she lying to herself, choosing to believe to be herself someone who would do such things instead accept she was a victim?
I still believe than Cain choose this path because she thought than the Phantom Rider always had been a ghost and Bobbi never killed anyone, because, well, the guy already was a ghost! He could fall from a cliff, but that can't kill a ghost. In the mind of Cain, there was no crime and everyone had been very unfair to Bobbi, who had acted fully on her right.
Ok, I accept these are not the best explanations, but really I don't want to believe than Cain made such mistake intentionally. Maybe on the script it sounded good, but in the final product the effect was the opposite of the one she wanted to reflect.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin