Explain to me how "editorial hates us" is a criticism.This post is just conflating criticism with harassment, and observations with personal attacks.
You'll have to ask the user who said it (it's too vague), but it's not a crazy thought. At the very least, Editorial has shown clear signs of frustration with fans.
You're aware that every media site (including CBR) is paid and gets exclusive scoops from Marvel and DC, right? This isn't a secret. It's no different than real life journalism.
I would argue that fans have crossed the line and Marvel creatives have also at times kicked the hornet’s nest. We have creators on record saying Spider-Man fans are impossible to please, and we have fans personally attacking the creatives. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
Tit-for-tat is not how I want to approach things.
I will say what I always do; be respectful but honest. Share your criticisms, but be polite.
Don’t become “noise”. I know a lot of us are inordinately unhappy with the book right now (myself included), but if you want to truly change things, it is better to champion the type of stories and characters you want to see more of.
I’ve said before, if Marvel restores the marriage, I’ll support it as long as that lasts, just as I said I’d do for Superman and The Flash. And I’ve been true to my word.
But this “Us vs Them” mindset is terrible for the book. On all sides.
There are reasonable and civil supporters are both sides here. Don’t go off the deep end, no matter how much a story might piss you off.
And if they try and rile you up, take the high road. “Be greater”.
Inexcusable then and inexecusable now.
One of many reasons I STILL advocate for better peer-review at comic publishers.
Can you imagine saying that with sex abuse survivors in the room? Just utterly tone-deaf and ignorant. And sadly I’ve heard stories like that across the medium, where the guys in charge laugh and joke about rape and women killing. The industry has come a long way, but a lot is still defined by a very outdated corporate boy’s club mentality.
Hell.
STILL, I’d say be better than that.
Edit: This is why I’ve sounded off on Marvel having so many stories that threaten Mary Jane with rape. Almost no other major character at Marvel has had so many rape attempts. I never want to see it again.
Last edited by Garlador; 08-21-2023 at 08:47 PM.
This doesn't surprise me, and was (and in many cases remains) a problem in certain quadrants of the comic industry. Mark Millar shared a similar story concerning Wonder Woman (read at your own risk).
spoilers:end of spoilers
"I pitched this to DC for a laugh years back. The idea was that, like 'Death of Superman', we had 'Rape of Wonder Woman'; a twenty-two page rape scene that opened up into a gatefold at the end just like Superman did."
The comic's idea surfaced around 1993, the year of the mentioned Death of Superman arc as well as the Batman arc Knightfall where the Caped Crusader got his spine broken by Bane and is forced to give the Batman identity to violent anti-hero Azrael as he recovers. Despite Millar saying that the story was just a joke he had made, he mentioned the fact that DC Comics was actually considering publishing the story and already had an artist draw a sketch for the comic's first page.
This was meant to be DC's way of exploring a state of weakness to Wonder Woman in a similar vein to the previously Superman and Batman stories; with the comic starting with Wonder Woman being violated in public. However, the increase of rape allegations in the media at the time and a lot of complaints in both DC's writing and art departments lead to the comic's quick cancellation.