Here are some highlights from Kelly Thompson’s AMA today, over on LOCG:
https://leagueofcomicgeeks.com/commu...hread/16985723
-
Q: What kind of research into a characters previous stories do you do before taking on a character like Black Widow? I ask because I think you nailed her character so well.
How important is Canon to you when writing an established character?
A: I read a lot, of course. In Black Widow's case it was mostly re-reading because I've long been a fan of the character and have read most of her stories. But something that quickly happens when doing that reading is that takes you like emerge and takes you don't like emerge -- and you naturally lean into the ones that feel right to you. But I learned when I was writing the Rogue & Gambit mini-series (which leans heavily on old canon stories to try to carve a new path) that every story (and every character) is SOMEONE'S favorite. Even stuff you hate, someone loves it! So I try to be really careful about respecting past continuity and not throwing anything away if I can help it. If it doesn't work for me I lean away from it and push in other directions, but I try to give it room to still exist. In Nat's case there was a lot I loved out there and I pushed toward it with our story and I think we were largely successful. It always bums me out when I find Nat fans that hated our run (it absolutely happens) but then I try to shrug and let it go -- you can't please all of the people, all of the time. It's impossible.
-
Q: You've managed to turn me around on characters that didn't interest me much and made my favorites shine extra bright. What approach do you take with your writing that makes us want to root for these characters so much? Also, do you have more stories for Carol and her current X-Men pals if the opportunity ever returns?
A: Thank you! It means a lot to me to hear you say that as I know you have some strong feelings about these characters! ;D I talked a bit about it in the answer above, but I do think having respect for the other stories and characters is important. I try really hard not to nerf characters for plot convenience -- not only is every character SOMEONE'S favorite -- but every story is an opportunity to make someone a new fan of a character. Turning someone around on a character they've never liked before makes me feel like a god -- a nice benevolent cool god that just wants people to read more. lol.
I would LOVE to write more "Carol and the X-Men" but it looks like that ship has sailed.
Onto the next!
-
Q: who is your dream character that you wish you could write but haven't yet?
A: Daredevil.* Batman. Wonder Woman.
I'd add a bunch of characters here but maaaaaybe I'm writing one of my dream projects right now that includes a whole bunch of them? ;D
(*I technically wrote him already in a few panels in Jessica Jones).
-
Q: I am a big X-Men fan and the Binary/Brood saga is one of my favorite arcs from Claremont's run, so this storyline has been an absolute delight for me personally.
A: Same for me on Brood/Claremont stuff.
-
Q: Have new projects planned which you can talk about?
A: The Cull, obviously, we just debuted a big preview for (both on my Substack and also if you're reading Black Cloak in print you can see the pages there too). I have one VERY BIG EXCITING project to announce... but can't quite yet.
-
Q: Captain Marvel is ending after a huge and record-breaking 50 issues run, did you initially plan it as such? Was your original pitch shorter/longer? What is your favorite part or arc from the series? Are there any cut ideas that you can disclose that didn't make it to the final page?
A: My original pitch for Captain Marvel was just a five-issue arc. Though I pitched a few arcs that would have taken us through probably a first year. Famously, the Falling Star arc was supposed to come first, but Marvel got excited about the Nuclear Man stuff and all Carmen's "Mad Max-y" designs and decided to go with that arc first. Everything from then on was just planning arc to arc. I don't think any ideas got cut, it was more just that some things I would have liked to do didn't fit with other things going on in the Marvel U (i.e. I love Mystique and would have been interested in featuring her -- but for where Mystique is at right now it didn't make sense to use her -- and I'm sure I wouldn't have been allowed due to other things going on with her). I had also been wanting to use The Brood (and X-Men!) since day one, but fortunately that one panned out for our final arc -- issue #49 is out today! ;D
-
Q: In film, there are actors and directors who speak to having greater creative freedom and choice once they win a major award. At the same time, some of them also say winning a major award means they are now under more scrutiny and thus become more selective with their next projects. In that light, how has winning an Eisner for your work on Black Widow changed your writing? Do publishers and editors give you a longer leash? Are you able to lean more into creator owned work? Does your creative process become even more experimental?
A: I don't think winning an Eisner has changed me as a writer at all. I do think that in SOME ways it potentially opens doors -- it's a good thing to be able to say in my bio, or tack onto announcements that gives me/the project a bit of shine/potential pedigree and I think comic publishers are happy to have that in their quiver for PR and such, but it's hard to know for sure how much it helps (or hurts?)
Like, I want to say it all helps... buuuuut the book I won the Eisner for was cancelled and I'm barely doing any work for that company anymore and am no longer under and exclusive with them, so I guess it can't matter THAT much?