Rachel has always definitely given me butch vibes. She might dress it up on occasion but I’m kinda shocked that folks haven’t seen her that way. I always thought that was the whole point of her character.
Rachel has always definitely given me butch vibes. She might dress it up on occasion but I’m kinda shocked that folks haven’t seen her that way. I always thought that was the whole point of her character.
Rachel sported a mullet, which I find rather butch per se. She also wore a lot of leather jackets. She even rode motorbikes in one of the Cable series.
The major time she really wore "femme" clothing was when she tried to emulate Marvel Girl, and she hated it.
Why would your taste in character design offend anyone though ? I don't dislike that costume, way more in character (and still, leather sleeves) than her stint as Marvel Girl or Prestige.
I don't understand, but the only "realtv" I watch is Drag Race (and the "real" is really a joke).
Are you put off by someone gushing over their partner ?
Also I thought "tomboy" and butch would be more or less synonymous, tomboy being applied to young girls (or trans boys but let's not get into that)
Yeah proably best to just drop it. To me tom boy is a term for a girl or woman that traditionally dresses or acts masculine but is suppose to be straight. I mean the term in itself is inherently bad imo because it implies there is a feminine way for women to dress or masculine way for men to dress. Then there is the term stud, which is traditionally suppose to be some tall handsome prince charming looking dude. So the implication that a female turns into a stud and just happens to fit that exact image, seems like a weird term and also basically piegon holds a female into a type. Which as far as i know is different from trans where the person on the inside is the opposite gender but the outside doesn't match. I mean if i'm honest the only thing that confuses me about gender identity is the us, they, them, because i take certain words literally and because of that when i hear they i'm thinking plural so i usally just call someone by their name or chosen name because then i am identifying exactly who you tell me you are. But in general i don't like PDA but that's a personal thing for me, it doesn't bother me personally if others have PDA and like PDA but i personally for me am not that type of person and that's okay too. But someone fawning over a woman in the way rachel does, "oh she so beautiful, oh she so this, oh don't let anyone hit on this person, oh i'll field the calls" for me, imo, that is creepy behavior when i see it. Is it creepy in every situation? No. But the vibe i get from rachel is desperate and unsure of herself. I personally don't get why people play into what feels like tropes and that feels like what is happening to rachel. She literally went from the character she was visually to a "stud"
Last edited by jwatson; 06-02-2023 at 07:16 AM.
Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
Number of People on my ignore list: 0
#conceptualthinking ^_^
#ByeMarvEN
Into the breach.
https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/
Like I said, I was talking more about her She-Hulk/Polaris, circa Muir Island Saga anatomy, i.e., broader shoulders, considerable difference in height compared to Elisabeth. This depiction of Rachel is unprecedented.
Rogue has sported mullets and biker/punk attire, both in the 80's and the early 00's, -not to mention superhuman strength- it would be equally silly and forced to pull something similar to that on her. Just my two cents.
Beats me, I made a remark on how the book shows the same flaws in execution with every issue a couple of pages ago, while fully recognising that I am only basing my input on online reviews, and that was enough to trigger a certain poster.Why would your taste in character design offend anyone though ? I don't dislike that costume, way more in character (and still, leather sleeves) than her stint as Marvel Girl or Prestige.
So...
- "butch" is not necessarily a physique, it's more about the look. A petite woman can be butch. A femme woman can be very fit. She-Hulk is considered more femme than butch.
- I absolutely don't see "she-hulk anatomy" for Rachel here. She has broader shoulders with the suit, which has shoulder pads, as many suits have. Her present actual super hero costume show much thin shoulders. In fact, the space costume you posted show her more muscular than this one.
- I always assumed Rachel was rather tall, maybe because she was always next to Kitty XD
- Early Rogue was indeed sporting a rather butch face and hair, but her looks went way more "femme" afterwards.
and I'm sorry but you're coming off rather ignorant and disingenuous in your misuse of "trigger" or "offense" but I prefer to assume you're actually interested in what you're saying.
I suggest you find a definition of "butch", it's rather interesting. Maybe read Stone Butch blues.
I think the jealousy of Saturnyne plays a part but there is LITERALLY no love loss between Rachel and Saturnyne. Sat spent the entire first 45 issues of Excalibur trying to kidnap and imprison Rachel for her own gain. Add the trying to seduce and rape Brian and her obsession with the Braddocks, and you have a woman who is all set with her girlfriend spending ANY time with Sat.
Rachel has always been queer coded. Claremont always had an endgame of Rachel and Kitty, but wasn't allowed to do anything with it because of the CCA. Rachel since arriving in 616 has looked more genderqueer in her day clothes than most others. Yes Storm and Rogue also had more punk gender-pushing attire in JRJr days, but not like Rachel. And throughout Excalibur Rachel was sexy but with a tomboy / BDSM flair. Red leather everything, mullet, more muscular build in comparison to Meggan and Kitty, "boy" clothes. Only during her time as Marvel Girl did Claremont try to make her more femme and the inexperienced hero (which still makes no sense. I mean her not knowing how to walk in heels after those Phoenix costumes???) and still not being comfy in those clothes. Once she came back that Schism costume SCREAMED lesbian. Moreso than this one, especially with the pixie cut.
Yes to all of this.
Also some of y’all got some stuff to unpack. Even *if* Rachel was depicted as a little more masc presenting in this book, why is that a problem? Like others have mentioned she’s never been an overly feminine character with exceptions few and far between.
Lastly, I don’t know how she could come off as creepy when she’s talking about her girlfriend who also spend the entire issue fawning over her and showing her off.
Rachel has always come off butch femme to me.
So how she appears here tracks IMO
I do dislike that they make her taller than Betsy though.
"I will duel you a hundred times, one thousand. I will fight you in the name of every single one of my kind." - Betsy Braddock
Krakoa, Arakko, and Otherworld forever!
I find it funny that Betsy is 5'11, and Rachel is 5'6" Yet, Rachel is taller than Betsy? Lol.
This is Betsy Braddock, WITHOUT HEELS.
I know those two Cosplayers, and Gillykins is the Psylocke, and is the same height in Real life as Betsy in comic. Rogue is only 1 inch shorter than Rogue would be in life.
I despise when people draw her so short, lol. /end rant.
Im just going to be honest. This post feels like an example of gaslighting. What exact stuff would people have to unpack? Why would stating the obvious mean there is a personal problem with it? Why is the bigger topic being ignored where Rachel is being turned into an acceptable stereotype that is specifically presented to the public as this is what a gay female couple should look like to have any sort of notoriety. Why doesn't the community seem to have a problem with it? Those are some things i think a lot of people need to unpack in themselves if they are looking for true representation and equality. Why did Rachel need to visually become a stud? Also personality wise she kind of comes of like the hollywood personality type for a stud. i think that is a great question.
Last edited by jwatson; 06-03-2023 at 05:38 AM.
Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
Number of People on my ignore list: 0
#conceptualthinking ^_^
#ByeMarvEN
Into the breach.
https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/