This was sparked by a discussion on another thread; the usual pro-OMD/anti-OMD argument brought up how much or how less No Way Home was an adaptation of One More Day.
My perception is that, in general, most people sort of see it as different enough to not really impact the argument on OMD’s quality; that whether it’s an adaptation or not, it doesn’t really “prove” OMD’s value to critics or supporters:
Conceptually, it’s important to note that No Way Home is not targeted at ending the relationship with MJ as it’s be-all, end-all purpose and focus, and may even in fact have negligible impact on their relationship beyond possible temporary angst in Holland’s next movie - that’s the most obvious foundational difference that can make it sort of fun to debate how much of an adaptation it is.
However, the more interesting debate to have about it is how much the radical difference in the plotting, stakes, consequences, and manner of the “cosmic retcon” disqualifies it as a comparison or “proves” the problem is more with the poor plotting of OMD: the conflict is not “my old aunt is dying and is okay with that, but I’m not” and is instead “My aunt *is dead*, and if we don't act quickly, everyone else will die too”; the magic is not “literally malevolent and demonic Faustian bargain targeting mostly just a marriage” but instead “multi-verse spanning emergency heroism by Doctor Strange of which MJ’s relationship with Peter is a sad side-effect”; the characters are not going “It’s worth acting radically different from my normal behavior to willfully do this clearly crappy idea” but is instead “we don't really have a choice, and I don’t want to do this, but I have to”, etc.
Soooo…
How much do you think it’s an adaptation, or something too different to be so?