Well past time.
Well past time.
All I wanted was to be unconditionally loved while never having to work on my flaws. Is that so much to ask?
yup he needs to have a stable job get the marriage done and advance his hero career
"He's pure power and doesn't even know it. He's the best of us."-Matt Murdock
"I need a reason to take the mask off."-Peter Parker
"My heart half-breaks at how easy it is to lie to him. It breaks all the way when he believes me without question." Felicia Hardy
Come on Marvel, why are you so scared??? You already have Miles, Gwen and now Bailey...
No he should be the same forever because that’s clearly what’s healthiest for the narrative as evidenced by the 15 years of mediocre, at best, wheel spinning that’s been going on
1312
I'd be down with this. My main objection to Modern 616 Peter is he is so immature and incompetent I feel like I'm reading High School Era Peter again (and not in a good way), that aspect needs to go. We have Miles for those early character growth stories. The character of 616 Peter should start progressing again ASAP.
Last edited by Celgress; 06-28-2023 at 09:04 AM.
"So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."
Thoughts on the video.
It is the big question for Spider-Man comics.
The base characterization is one of the best in comics. Departing from that too much has major downsides, although this might get to a conflict between people who liked Spider-Man when he was younger, and those who have liked that he has grown and changed in significant ways.
Whether MJ is endgame is also something for Marvel to deal with.
The video is informed, noting the creator controversy and the effects of the Night Gwen Stacy died. And it seems fair to multiple sides in a way that is pretty rare in comic book commentary videos. For much of it, the pro-OMD would agree with her interpretation of their views.
I'm not sure the Dick Grayson comparison works because Spider-Man is so much more important. In the bat-titles Dick Grayson is almost certainly surpassed by Bruce Wayne, the Joker and Catwoman in terms of significance to overall comics (and you could make a case for Commissioner Gordon and Batgirl as surpassing him as well.)
It's an interesting question of whether Peter's trajectory is leading to a natural end, and whether that's a good thing. It is a closing off of stories.
I don't think it's going to be the same types of stories if he's trying to balance family life with being Spider-Man; it's a different story engine rather than a new layer.
I like her realization that many fans aren't paying attention to these arguments, and that she seems interested in hearing multiple perspectives. She's good at this.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Part of what made DBZ and later GT and Super so good was that the story moved forwards a lot. You can tell very similar stories with a new character in the same world. It can be similar but interesting. What you can't do is writing the first meeting between two characters more than once. (and, no, DBS Broly doesn't count, he's just not the same character as the original Broly) and that's the sort of mistake Marvel keeps making. you can't erase continuity without wrecking the reasons people paid attention to it. Sure, Toriyama-Sama made Super set in a time period before GT, and the two can't be the same timeline, but, the way Super is written doesn't invalidate GT. In fact it treats certain aspects of GT as inevitabilities despite not following the same story. for example, a major player in GT was Goku's grand-daughter Pan... who gets born in Super the same as before. But is much younger and thus doesn't do as much.... but Pan DOEs demonstrate she's got the potential to grow up in the same way as in GT.
He’s already “grown up”; I’d argue that what he is right now is a grown ass man who vacillates between showing his age in a positive way, or acting like a man-child at worst. He’s not a kid anymore, and he’s only a “young man” whenever he’s in the room with someone past 50. If they want him young, I’d say they should make some Spider-Man version of “Legends of the Dark Knight,” with a series that “floats” down the timeline and has ambiguous continuity in case someone goes too far. If they want immaturity, than put him at the age where he’s naturally immature; if they want inexperienced girl trouble, than put him back when he was still getting the hang of dating at all.
Now, I don’t think that the most important, month-to-month “obligatory formula” of Spider-Man would actually be that broken up if he had a daughter with MJ to raise; I actually haven’t mentioned this in the other threads, but my perception of the adventures he had while married was that it was 90% the same as before, and only really subbed out inconsistent dating stories for brief flashes of his home life that were sweet, but not usually defining of the book.
Peter’s home life is a background issue that *does* define the era it’s in, but isn’t as important in the immediate construction of the single issues; his work life and costume life take precedence there, which is part of the reason why a lot of the stories of the period are so legendary even among marriage haters and are easier to see in adaptations. I’d argue this holds true for most young parents in comics, even as rare as they are; Arsenal raising Lian didn’t impede his superhero life either.
…So I honestly think that if they did have him and MJ reconcile and raise a kid, the MO for how to write his new era would be pretty easy; if you know how to make the domestic drama engaging, do so, and if you don’t, then keep his home life on the background… which is honestly advise I would give to a lot of anti-marriage writers anyways since so many suck at writing too **** there anyways.
Like action, adventure, rogues, and outlaws? Like anti-heroes, femme fatales, mysteries and thrillers?
I wrote a book with them. Outlaw’s Shadow: A Sherwood Noir. Robin Hood’s evil counterpart, Guy of Gisbourne, is the main character. Feel free to give it a look: https://read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asi...E2PKBNJFH76GQP
This is 100% just my baseless conjecture, but my theory on why they don’t just do what you’re saying and have Peter’s character actually progress in the main book and use a LOTDK style book to explore stories of him as a youth, is because the LOTDK book would obviously get clobbered in sales by ASM and they’d have to admit that letting the character grow isn’t actually the narrative poison they’ve been trying to sell it as
1312
Nah, I don't need comic book characters to grow up along with me.
♪ღ♪*•.¸¸¸.•*¨ ¨*•.¸¸¸.•*•♪ღ♪¸.•*¨ ¨*•.¸¸¸.•*•♪ღ♪•*
♪ღ♪░NORAH░WINTERS░FOR░SPIDER-WAIFU░♪ღ♪
*•♪ღ♪*•.¸¸¸.•*¨ ¨*•.¸¸¸.•*•♪¸.•*¨ ¨*•.¸¸¸.•*•♪ღ♪•«