Ed McGuinness = Lois & Clark
Ed McGuinness = Lois & Clark
Oh God! I absolutely hated McGuiness' cartoony, manga inspired style on Superman.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
A bat! That's it! It's an omen.. I'll shall become a bat!
Pre-CBR Reboot Join Date: 10-17-2010
Pre-CBR Reboot Posts: 4,362
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ So... what's your excuse now?
I’ll go modern. Give me Dan Mora’s beautiful clean lines for Superman. Bachalo’s frenetic weirdness for Dr. Strange. Patrick Gleason’s fun cartoon look on Super Sons.
IMG_1479.jpg
IMG_1477.jpg
IMG_1478.jpg
I think we need another word for "cartoony." I've been struggling to find one for years, but I've failed. Cartoony doesn't work because everything in comics is cartoony--or should be. Even Neal Adams is cartoony. Alex Ross paintings aren't--but that's not really comic book art in my book, it's more like a cross between comic art progressions and fumetti photo progressions--too static and not dynamic story telling.
All good comic book art is figurative in nature--not literal. It's on a two-dimensional page. It's minimalist--drawing with as few lines and blobs as needed something that opens up our imagination. We see in those squiggles and the black negative space something else in our mind's eye. It's not trying to render every single molecule of reality on a piece of paper (or a screen). It's making us see what isn't there. To do that, the artist has to have a cartoony sense of reality.
Some very serious comics have what people call a cartoony style. The dissonance between the image and the subject creates a wonderful feeling in the reader. Something like MAUS for example. It's like how some sad Beatles songs were sung to an upbeat tempo.
Also, as I get older, I realize that the so-called realistic art isn't what reality actually looks like. Reality is weird and the people in it have funny faces, even when they're in the depths of despair.
A bat! That's it! It's an omen.. I'll shall become a bat!
Pre-CBR Reboot Join Date: 10-17-2010
Pre-CBR Reboot Posts: 4,362
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ So... what's your excuse now?
I know what you mean. And I'm not trying to give you a hard time on this question, but it's something I've thought a lot about. I can't convince you I'm right, but I do believe the "lighthearted" style is just as good as the dark and gritty for telling serious stories. It seems to me that many artists like John Byrne, Alan Davis and Marshall Rogers could draw in this style and yet tell serious stories. And in Europe, it's much more common for comic book artists to have this style, even though the adventures stories are grounded. Likewise with Manga.
I think it was in Kurt Schaffenberger's wheelhouse to draw pages that had more gravitas. And it's actually to Schaffenberger that I compare McGuinness. I get that Big Ed was going for a big foot style and I was okay with that, but I thought he needed to work on it a bit more. His Superman's anatomy is just too clumsy for his own good. Whereas, Schaffenberger could animate figures with ease on the page. Or look at someone like Frank Quitely, who started out drawing Superman as kind of oafish in appearance yet by the time of ALL-STAR SUPERMAN had arrived at a more elegant approach to the character.
Speaking of Dan Mora, the most recent version of Dick Grayson/Robin from World's Finest has become a personal fave (XD)
José Luis García-López = Barry Allen
Ivan Reis = Aquaman