Wonder Woman #3 Preview

[Koriand'r]

Why tf does the invisible plane have gatling guns?

Post Crisis it often has guns, it doesn't fire bullets or missals though, it fires the same invisible matter that makes up the jet.

WW INVI PHIL.jpg

There's a super interesting discussion about Wonder Woman and the ethics of her using guns on twitter (I refuse to call it x).

[Primal Slayer]

Post Crisis it often has guns, it doesn't fire bullets or missals though, it fires the same invisible matter that makes up the jet.

WW INVI PHIL.jpg

There's a super interesting discussion about Wonder Woman and the ethics of her using guns on twitter (I refuse to call it x).

Its still twitter.com so you're well within your rights!

[HestiasHearth]

Why tf does the invisible plane have gatling guns?

Because making Diana surface-level, comic-book-cliche "badass" is more important to King than accurate characterization.

[Gaius]

Can't say I'm getting too up in arms over a jet having guns on it.

[Agent Z]

Because making Diana surface-level, comic-book-cliche "badass" is more important to King than accurate characterization.

How is it inaccurate? Diana isn't anti-gun and I'm pretty sure the jet has had weapons before.

[Agent Z]

Post Crisis it often has guns, it doesn't fire bullets or missals though, it fires the same invisible matter that makes up the jet.

WW INVI PHIL.jpg

There's a super interesting discussion about Wonder Woman and the ethics of her using guns on twitter (I refuse to call it x).

It's about as interesting as the inane conversations about her using a sword or whether she should kill.

[SiegePerilous02]

Post Crisis it often has guns, it doesn't fire bullets or missals though, it fires the same invisible matter that makes up the jet.

WW INVI PHIL.jpg

There's a super interesting discussion about Wonder Woman and the ethics of her using guns on twitter (I refuse to call it x).

Because making Diana surface-level, comic-book-cliche "badass" is more important to King than accurate characterization.

Can't say I'm getting too up in arms over a jet having guns on it.

How is it inaccurate? Diana isn't anti-gun and I'm pretty sure the jet has had weapons before.

We're likely not going to see the jet much beyond this panel, so I won't get hung up on it too much.

but the overall design looks like something from our world which makes it more mundane (Jimenez's is vastly superior), and the Amazons using guns just feels wrong. If they fire something other than bullets than whatever, but I don't care for the imagery.

[Mantis-Ray]

How is it inaccurate? Diana isn't anti-gun and I'm pretty sure the jet has had weapons before.

Literally every time I see the jet in something, at minimum it always fires missiles

[Perseus]

Can't say I'm getting too up in arms over a jet having guns on it.

Preaching in an empty church right here. My thoughts the same though. Every time it's the same five people on Twitter crying and shouting about Diana using a sword still.

[Frontier]

Gotta be honest I don't usually read the Invisible Jet as being teched out like a normal military jet.

[Psy-lock]

The Invisible Jet being just a regular-looking jet that turns invisible is so lame. I'll take Morrison's vagina-shaped one any day

[Vordan]

Why are people blaming King for the jet? I know why but it’s idiotic, Sampere is the one who drew it . King keeps his scripts sparse, if he specifically asked for the jet to have guns then sure, hate away, but I wager that was Sampere’s call.

[Agent Z]

I'm guessing she still has the ability to mentally command the jet. Or was that Steve flying it?

[Skytten]

So with Trinity's dad maybe being through a relationship with Emelie that makes for other potential fathers. I'm guessing it will be someone we might already know, who I have no idea maybe a villain?

[Donpayne]

It's not inaccurate, just inconsistent with her persona, if that makes sense