My take on DClock is that it is unfairly criticized. Simply due to the fact that a lot of what people didn't like about it had reasons we don't know, but can only guess at. The art was very good but the shifting mid-range about the story and the lateness were annoying.
As for DC characters swearing, I think Bruce, Clark, and Diana would not swear. Well, maybe Bruce undercover. Guy Gardner, Ollie Queen? Sure. What gets me is the use of Grawlix, particularly Tom King's excessive use of them. Somehow, the effects of reading a character actually swearing as opposed to rattling off keyboard symbols make a big difference in how I read a story.
I’ll don the mask and wear the cape
If I am super, how can I wait?
Don't forget his Aquaman run. Its def up there. Eventually all really popular creators will get hate. Its the cycle of fame. Johns will always be one of my favorites though. His wins and ideas and concepts are way more hit than miss. And i'll go a step further, I really think if Geoff Johns was a driving voice behind the scenes during the launch of the DCEU those movies would've been even better. He could've been DC's Kevin Feige YEARS ago.
As I understand it from insiders who have posted here and elsewhere, the failure of DC You led to Johns getting the chance to do "Rebirth." For some reason, DiDio and Lee, who had been working on other projects, returned to the publishing division in full, derailed Doomsday Clock, brought Bendis in and gave Snyder the task of "fixing" continuity while ultimately undoing Rebirth.
Make no mistake of this: the Doomsday Clock delays were not due to Johns or Frank, despite comic shill sites (and hacks like Rich Johnston) pushing this narrative for years. This was personal between DiDio and Johns. I've always thought this panel was a direct shot at DiDio from Johns. The alliteration seals it for me:
darkdirections.jpg
I think profanity is different than using the wrong word. Just saying that as a person who frequently swears, but hates the misuse of "literally."
I feel like characters swearing depends on the character and what type of book it is.
Honestly, I'm not fond of overuse of modern slang and humor in a lot of comics these days. To some degree, it just feels like it's trying too hard to be hip and takes away from the more timeless quality of the characters. Even when I was a kid, I rolled my eyes at that kind of thing.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
I think it’s pretty unfairly criticised. At the time Damian was still popular despite being a sociopathic and murderous brat and the general mood across the board
It was also shown pretty quickly (as in, can’t have post dated the criticism) both a negative within the comic itself and front developed to deal with the fact that the US child welfare system isn’t exactly known for being gumdrops and ice cream
I think whatever happened in the aftermath of the JL film (I’m inclined to the most condemning end, but the main accuser has done himself no favours on consistency) seems to have pretty much destroyed Johns’ passion for DC comics. He had difficulty with deadlines before then, but after he got canned the doomsday clock delays became so much worse.
His return last year seems to have been based on the idea that Black Adam and Flash would vindicate the stories (which he wrote and then optioned as CCO) would vindicate him. And they flopped, hard.
I believe he still has his passion. But he probably was very reluctant to accept the role of just another writer, without being in position of an architect of the entire franchise. He clearly wants his work to have an impact on DC, just like in the past, he tried it with Three Jokers (which DC openly refused to acknowledge as a canon story), Flashpoint Beyond, JSA, etc. But he's not the one, who sets up a direction, and he's probably too ambitious to play along, especially if he's not really fond of the current direction.
We should give thanks to... "DArk DIrections" for that. Johns still had his share of ideas for DC but after all he choose to go in his own.
I mean, look at his imprint: it is pretty evident than a lot of those ideas were originally DC proposals.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
Unfairly criticized probably articulates what I meant better than underrated. The delivery certainly didn't match the potential and hype that it had, but a lot of that is apparently due to outside factors.
I thought the actually story itself was a very entertaining and satisfying ending to The New 52.
I also thought the idea of Superman and Dr. Manhattan acting as symbols of hope and cynicism was logical and a clever way of restoring hope to the DCU, while also criticizing the impact that Watchmen had on the industry.
And I liked the explanation of moving Alan's lantern as the cause of the New 52 much more than Pandora randomly showing up and merging a bunch of universes as well.
Thanks this post comes the closest to answering the question I posed when opening this thread. Some maintained that Johns was just slow but I knew there was more to it than that. It also appears that he has been planning a rebellion of his own by convincing the A-list artists most associated with his most successful runs to join him at Ghost Machine, this feels like a big hit on DC's talent pool not quite as big as the Image boys fleeing Marvel initially but big all the same and the Ghost Machine crew was smart enough to bring some prolific writers along with them which the Image guys did not. I am excited to give the Ghost Machine a chance but I bemoan the fact that so much talent is leaving DC when their are properties that could use A-list talent to bring them back or reinvigorate them.
For me who appreciates Watchmen but never saw it as the end all be all of alternative universe tales, for me it, the Dark Knight Returns and Kingdom Come weren't as compelling to me as Squadron Supreme which blew my mind but I am of a certain age and there is only so many times your mind can be blown up. There is a cynicism to Watchmen and a Darkness to Dark Knight returns that doesn't really fit into the ethos of DC. Days of Future Past bleak future fits in the "realistic" ethos of Marvel but DC always had innocence to it ala the Legion. Sort of like I don't think the Authority can work in the main DC universe and why Wildcats, an X-men analogy, doesn't really fit as well in the main DC universe. I guess while I groaned at Doomsday Clock being so Watchmen centric because like I said I never felt the feel of it fit in the main DC, looking back at it, Johns felt the same way and was trying to explain that.