As should be painfully clear by now to anyone reading along at home, simply explaining things to Mets doesn't get any change in behavior or response from him. He's gotten to the point of claiming clicking the same link again is searching for what's been done since instead of actually searching, while adding so much plausible sounding bovine-excrement (without evidence) to The Week's article to excuse their lies & refusal to update.
I don't think anyone is actually fooled by this, but it's best to point it out in case any aren't sure which is why I continue.
-------
And back to The Week's lies, To review:
You can tell they are lies because nothing of what Mets has brought up was actually mentioned in the article, nor is there any evidence of the reporter diligently tracking down
anonymous respondents to check their chromosomes. On top of that, Mets has 'forgotten' that 0.5 of his total is listed as "My Identity Is Not Listed". When we remove them and AMAB individuals from the count we wind up with 3.5 instead of 5. Then we get to the truly transphobic part of these lies: If we assume that exactly half of the respondents are born Male/Female, there is absolutely no point other than causing fear & hate to bring up
only those brought up as girls.
It's also been pointed out (with at least one study posted) that the rising Anti-Trans bigotry is particularly focused on trans women and making them out to be predators (BATHROOMS!), which would chill many of those individuals from coming out as trans so evidence has been posted to explain any disparity in numbers. I'm sure I could find other studies mentioning that with a quick google search just like Mets could, but I'm not linking to what's been already posted deliberately to see if he will try to find it or question if it's actually been posted (Like with evidence of Nex's Bullying).
But Daily Kos is trash and we should all acknowledge it. (eyeroll)
Here's another attempt to get the point about The Week through to Mets: