Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 01:31 AM.
Last edited by aja_christopher; 04-19-2024 at 01:38 AM.
As I've mentioned, I haven't read pages and pages of posts/discussion, nor do I honestly care to do so.
I was having a nice breakfast, read your comment, which contained wrong data/assumption - if you think that's an "irrelevant detail", then why did you even write that it had been "established that bla bla"? Next time you can just leave out that "irrelevant detail", and so you don't risk getting corrected and you get folks to instead concentrate on the core of your message/argument
How would you characterize Biden's border policy, thus far?
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 01:48 AM.
It's not a question about agreeing with the source, it's that the source you used is using incomplete figures, only using "removals" instead of also using "returns". I sent you the full numbers, as referred in the CNN article (ironically the deporter in chief is a Democrat, but it's Clinton), you are free to read and understand or to ignore.
You have an interesting bar as to what constitutes an "irrelevant detail", to say the least...
You're projecting your "confirmation of the original argument", which I'm not even sure what it's supposed to be. I think Mets doesn't address the racism and bigotry in the GOP and you don't address (or you dismiss) the border situation. One is worse than the other but they are not mutually exclusive.
"Parents Rights Movement" - never heard of that.
Racism is bad. Bigotry is bad. These are universal values.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 02:16 AM.
You haven't dismissed the border issue? I asked you some posts ago: "How would you characterize Biden's border policy, thus far?" (post #4669) You didn't reply at all.
Apparently you ignored the question, so apparently you're failing to acknowledge the border issue, no? (like Mets is failing to acknowledge racism and bigotry in the GOP, when you ask him)
But feel free to point me to a past post where you've actually acknowledged the border issue, instead of dismissing the whole thing as "racism" or "but the GOP" (shutting down the bipartisan bill). Please point me to a post of yours, instead of calling me a liar, which just reflects badly on you.
"cant' say you weren’t given a shot" - I don't need you giving me 'a shot', thank you.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 07:44 AM.
Last edited by aja_christopher; 04-19-2024 at 02:35 AM.
So again, you dismiss/ fail to address the border issue, after being directly prompted about it. Noted.
You can't really ask of others (Mets) what you don't do yourself.
If anything, Democrats need to be more vocal about fixing the border, like Sen. Ossoff was with Mayorkas (video posted earlier) or the statements by Mayor Adams in NYC, etc.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 02:36 AM.
If you say that Mets "fails to address", it's because he might have been asked to address something, no? It seems logical.
On the other hand, I've asked you to address the border situation and you've chosen not to. Obviously you're not forced to, but I wonder why! And I think I've been polite to you, you jusy don't seem to have a good attitude.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 02:50 AM.
That's old news (I was referring to that some pages ago when I mentioned the GOP). We all know the GOP did that for purely political game reasons, to try to win votes. If you had watched the more recent Ossoff video I posted, he clearly mentions that, before asking Mayorkas to fix the border.
The situation with the border didn't start in 2024, btw.
How is this related to your position regarding the border, where you attack others for having "racist" positions about the border but then you actually don't say what your position is, dodging the issue.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 03:48 AM.