Watching television is not an activity.
The entire premise of his argument is false regardless -- immigration and border issues have already been discussed extensively by all involved.
The accusation that the issue is being "dodged" is clear deflection from the original topic of bigotry and prejudice within the Republican party and how it underlies organizations such as the Parents Rights Movement.
The current episode of deflection only makes this even more clear.
Last edited by aja_christopher; 04-19-2024 at 09:12 AM.
They could also do the same thing with Medicaid fraud. Most state fraud units, even if they got back every penny the charged individuals with, wouldn't even begin to start paying for the department budget. Most fraud isn't from individuals, but from over billing and fraudulent billing at the business end.
Dark does not mean deep.
Very true!!!! What does the US law say on hiring undocumented migrants, if companies are caught doing that?
You and I are having a civilized discussion and aja_christopher is just cranky/bad attitude, never mind. I don't care about his grudges or his intent to center discussion on topic A and disregarding topic B, that's not how forums work
You haven't discussed that topic with me, nor do I even know what your opinion is on the border. I asked you a question in good faith. You didn't reply. You didn't point me to past posts of yours on that topic. And you did that while saying that I'm "lying", that I'm "deflecting" (deflecting from what?! haha) and just with a terrible overall attitude. Simple. I'm not 'accusing' of anything, I'm stating a fact.
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 09:51 AM.
It's not my "responsibility" (and how would I even know where to start, there are 314 pages of posts on this thread alone, not to mention previous version threads). It's my choice - and obviously at this point I choose not to. I asked in good faith and politely, you didn't want to type even a single line about it and just went on a bizarre rant making weird accusations, so that's that. You have terrible attitude.
EDIT: You've added "If the argument is in good faith then that won’t be an issue." - if you would've pointed me to page XX or to date YY, I would've gone back to read, obviously, but without any clue this is like trying to find a needle in a haystack, also because the search function on this forum isn't great
Last edited by hyped78; 04-19-2024 at 10:04 AM.