And then you proceed to address none of the behaviors brought up, while attempting to gaslight presenting me as being "angry & evasive".
When I was discussing your behavior in the post you started replying to - I'm not limiting it to me. The posters I can name from memory who you've at least mischaracterized their arguments (And/or Played Dumb, Sealioned, Gaslit, etc) enough for them to comment on it in the past are thwhtGuardian, WBE, WPP, Tendrin, Kirby101, babyblob, Catlady in training, zinderel, CaptainEurope, aja_christopher, Tami, Adam Allen, and others that have faded from my memory for whatever reason (Stopped interacting with you, stopped posting, etc.). I apologize to each of you if you don't want me bringing you up (As well as to any who think they should be included) , but I'm trying to make a point about how often this behavior is engaged in. Behaving in the ways I've discussed with others is very rude & insulting to them. That's not getting into how many of them you've lied about and claimed that them pointing out where you won't accept/post evidence or are factually wrong and won't accept it is them attacking you unfairly (More than 2).
In addition, this behavior is shown on a multitude of subjects: Transphobia in the GoP, to Anti-LGBTQ+ bigotry in the GoP, Racism in the GoP, The acceptance of lies and liars in the GoP, what the open embrace of Trump & the politicians who do what he tells them to do means for the GoP, the attacks upon elections & voting by the GoP, the 'moderate' status of voting for Ron DeSantis, the dangers of bribing SCOTUS Justices, the dangers of how much Violence is being accepted by the GoP, the dangers of conservatives vilifying CRT/DEI/Pride Week Education/Teachers/Scientists/Reporters/Immigrants/More, the dangers of the promotion of the Great Replacement Theory by conservatives, and FAR more.
I could go on, but this is already a gish gallop by necessity. Now, back to The Week - Lots of mischaracterization, lies, and gaslighting going on to avoid acknowledging the simple fact that the study The Week brought up didn't say what they said it didd, and that they haven't cited any other studies/theories (That you love to bring up to confuse the issue) other than the one which specifically doesn't come close to "1-in-20" unless you add in results that don't qualify and round up where you shouldn't if you want to remain factual.
While you technically replied to these posts, you've never actually refuted what's contained in them:
And as Tendrin also noted how this was all a lie when the Study was actually posted years ago, I'm not the only one to notice. Nor have I ever claimed to be, but it seems suspicious to frame it like I am out of some self-importance/whatever.
To sum it up again: