Let's take a look.
I don't like being called a liar, especially if this board is a big part of my digital footprint.
So let's check out the comments.
To give basic context, I posted an article from The Week to support the idea of a significant increase in females (born with XX chromosomes) identifying as trans in college. The article had a line "About 0.6 percent of American adults identify as transgender, the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law has estimated. But in recent years, vastly more young people are seeking treatment for gender dysphoria, teen girls in particular. In surveys by the American College Health Association, the number of students brought up as girls identifying as transgender soared from 1 in 2,000 in 2008 to 1 in 20."
https://theweek.com/life/1006253/the...er-trans-teens
I was going to analyze posts from 2023 to show that I was under a misunderstanding of Dalak's claim that a reporter lied because he doesn't know whether someone identifying as nonbinary is biologically male.
But looking at the beginning of the argument, I see that I understood his argument as he made it.
Tendrin broke down the study. Some of these posts are on multiple issues, so I'm just quoting the relevant sections.
From Tendrin's perspective, people who are gender non-conforming do not fall in the umbrella of trans.
Dalak did not dispute this.
I responded that from my understanding gender non-conforming people count as trans.
Dalak responded.
So Dalak you've been gaslighting me for hundreds of posts. I summarized your argument accurately.
If you were mistaken, you owe me an apology.
If you're a troll, you owe it to everyone else.