Page 55 of 63 FirstFirst ... 545515253545556575859 ... LastLast
Results 811 to 825 of 931
  1. #811
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    Post-OMD/BND Peter has always given me strong "writers aren't really sure how to write him anymore" energy.

    I feel like Spencer did a decent job of writing him mature, experienced, without feeling old though.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevinroc View Post
    I think Spider-Man is a victim of his own popularity. I don't know how Marvel gets out of this situation they've built for themselves, but I also think they don't want to get out of this situation they've built for themselves. So they can endlessly regurgitate the same stories over and over again with slight variations from now until the time they stop publishing comics. The other, non-comic, media in this franchise are all about coming of age and growing up, but poor comic Peter is stuck in this endless cycle of repeating the same stories over and over again.

    And for MJ, that means breaking up and getting back with Peter over and over and over again until Marvel stops publishing comics.

    That was the point of OMD. That is its enduring legacy.
    It’s almost like Peter (and to an extent, MJ as his love interest) did such an effective job ending the repetitive and overtly cyclical Silver Age that the entire industry changed to follow him, mostly because he never abided by those “rules” in the first place... only for him to become the modern poster-child for an attempted reinstitution of those same rules, more so than other characters (who tend to either stay “progressed” or get rebooted so they *can* progress.)
    Like action, adventure, rogues, and outlaws? Like anti-heroes, femme fatales, mysteries and thrillers?

    I wrote a book with them. Outlaw’s Shadow: A Sherwood Noir. Robin Hood’s evil counterpart, Guy of Gisbourne, is the main character. Feel free to give it a look: https://read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asi...E2PKBNJFH76GQP

  2. #812
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by godisawesome View Post
    It’s almost like Peter (and to an extent, MJ as his love interest) did such an effective job ending the repetitive and overtly cyclical Silver Age that the entire industry changed to follow him, mostly because he never abided by those “rules” in the first place... only for him to become the modern poster-child for an attempted reinstitution of those same rules, more so than other characters (who tend to either stay “progressed” or get rebooted so they *can* progress.)
    I wouldn't say just Spider-man even, but the bulk of Marvel comics of the 60s-80s (Particularly Claremont's X-men) were complete game changers. And then DC followed Marvel's lead with the Teen Titans, Miller Batman, Byrne Superman, Perez Wonder Woman, etc. But somewhere along the lines (the 90s), Marvel's creations became "too popular", the speculator bubble burst, and editors adopted a "brand management" strategy whereby these characters can never veer too far from an established "evergreen" point for too long. And this strategy has just gotten progressively more flagrant and has likely contributed to the slow demise of comics.
    Last edited by Spider-Tiger; 04-19-2024 at 08:36 PM.

  3. #813
    Mighty Member Daibhidh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoganAlpha30X33 View Post
    Which just makes no sense at all as the kids never seemed to be important enough to actually do much, did they even have names...
    Of course they were important enough to be given names. They were so important they were given names more than once.
    Petrus Maria Johannaque sunt nubendi

  4. #814
    Formerly Assassin Spider Huntsman Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Posts
    21,605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoganAlpha30X33 View Post
    Which just makes no sense at all as the kids never seemed to be important enough to actually do much, did they even have names...
    Quote Originally Posted by Daibhidh View Post
    Of course they were important enough to be given names. They were so important they were given names more than once.
    The boy was Owen and the girl was either Romy or Stephanie. Even Wells couldn't be bothered keeping their names straight.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spider-Tiger View Post
    I wouldn't say just Spider-man even, but the bulk of Marvel comics of the 60s-80s (Particularly Claremont's X-men) were complete game changers. And then DC followed Marvel's lead with the Teen Titans, Miller Batman, Byrne Superman, Perez Wonder Woman, etc. But somewhere along the lines (the 90s), Marvel's creations became "too popular", the speculator bubble burst, and editors adopted a "brand management" strategy whereby these characters can never veer too far from an established "evergreen" point for too long. And this strategy has just gotten progressively more flagrant and has likely contributed to the slow demise of comics.
    Yeah, though it's especially pointed with Spider-Man, as at least the other heroes (and villains) in the MU are allowed to meaningfully progress and not automatically be reset to "factory defaults" after a run ends.
    The spider is always on the hunt.

  5. #815
    Mighty Member Garlador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    1,700

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daibhidh View Post
    Of course they were important enough to be given names. They were so important they were given names more than once.
    Lol. I needed a good laugh.
    Join the "Spider-Fam" Community! - Celebrating Love and Advocating for Our Hero to Beat the Devil! - https://discord.gg/VQ2mHzBBFu

  6. #816
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,374

    Default

    I'm a fan of Peter/MJ. I love the couple. I understand OMD at the time made some kind of sense. They wanted to shake things up. But 17 years of this? And the marriage isn't reinstated? Why? Are editorial afraid of writing for a married stable couple? Reed and Sue say hi. It can be done and be interesting just takes effort. It's like if editorial were a person and looked up at the sky. It's blue very obvious everyone can see it. But they shake their head and say "no, it's green." Fans have been crying for years to reinstate the marriage. Listen.

  7. #817
    Mighty Member Garlador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    1,700

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CTTT View Post
    I'm a fan of Peter/MJ. I love the couple. I understand OMD at the time made some kind of sense. They wanted to shake things up. But 17 years of this? And the marriage isn't reinstated? Why? Are editorial afraid of writing for a married stable couple? Reed and Sue say hi. It can be done and be interesting just takes effort. It's like if editorial were a person and looked up at the sky. It's blue very obvious everyone can see it. But they shake their head and say "no, it's green." Fans have been crying for years to reinstate the marriage. Listen.
    I’ve been catching up on Jeremy Adams’s The Flash run lately and it’s frustrating to read it and then compare it to 616 Peter and MJ, largely because it’s so fun and creative and also because of how essential and integral Wally and Linda’s relationship and marriage is. It’s the best “Spider-Man” book I’ve read in awhile as Wally struggles to pay bills, work his job, be a superhero, and find time for his wife and kids.

    And Linda is written with such strength and agency as a wife and mother with her own career, her own dreams and responsibilities, that it really spits all over any of the old Spidey Office excuses that marriage makes Peter too old or unremarkable or unrelatable, just because the dating drama is over. In Adams’s book, Linda is important. She’s got her own frustrations, her own fears, her own struggles, balanced against the understanding and joys of being married to a superhero who is such a good man but doesn’t always put her first in his life (hard to when “saving the world” is a daily responsibility). But they’re written with such love and care that their marriage absolutely, positively ENHANCES the book and characters. It is a better comic - and they are better characters - with this status quo.

    I boggles my mind that Spidey Office continues to feel differently. Having a partner in your corner is a boon for almost any superhero, and for Peter that absolutely was MJ at her best.
    Join the "Spider-Fam" Community! - Celebrating Love and Advocating for Our Hero to Beat the Devil! - https://discord.gg/VQ2mHzBBFu

  8. #818
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    116,307

    Default

    I enjoyed Adams' run though I found Linda with powers a bit too much and was happy that was just a one-off .

    Nick Spencer showed you can write a good run with a mature, capable, Peter and him and MJ together even if she's not even consistently in the book (but she still has impact even when she's gone).

  9. #819
    Mighty Member Garlador's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    1,700

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    I enjoyed Adams' run though I found Linda with powers a bit too much and was happy that was just a one-off .

    Nick Spencer showed you can write a good run with a mature, capable, Peter and him and MJ together even if she's not even consistently in the book (but she still has impact even when she's gone).
    Honestly, that's exactly how I would have done it with MJ too. Linda getting powers was designed as an intentional temporary thing, and the reason she even had them was due to a life-changing event that brought her and Wally closer together. Her losing those powers has also let her better understand the world from her husband's perspective - how fast life goes by with him, and how difficult it is to slow down and enjoy the quiet moments. Si Spurrier's done a decent job tackling her postpartum along with the loss of those powers, as she better grasps just how "lacking" she is in comparison to a hero with godlike superspeed, and the alienation she feels having only just sampled a glimpse of his world. And yet he doesn't view her as inferior or a burden; she's what drives him onward and makes life worth the living.

    In a better timeline, with a better status quo, I would have loved this same arc to be applied to Mary Jane and Peter. And maybe in a better future, we can get someone like Adams to write the couple and their marriage from this same interesting perspective. One day.
    Join the "Spider-Fam" Community! - Celebrating Love and Advocating for Our Hero to Beat the Devil! - https://discord.gg/VQ2mHzBBFu

  10. #820
    Formerly Assassin Spider Huntsman Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Posts
    21,605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CTTT View Post
    I'm a fan of Peter/MJ. I love the couple. I understand OMD at the time made some kind of sense. They wanted to shake things up. But 17 years of this? And the marriage isn't reinstated? Why? Are editorial afraid of writing for a married stable couple? Reed and Sue say hi. It can be done and be interesting just takes effort. It's like if editorial were a person and looked up at the sky. It's blue very obvious everyone can see it. But they shake their head and say "no, it's green." Fans have been crying for years to reinstate the marriage. Listen.
    Quote Originally Posted by Garlador View Post
    I’ve been catching up on Jeremy Adams’s The Flash run lately and it’s frustrating to read it and then compare it to 616 Peter and MJ, largely because it’s so fun and creative and also because of how essential and integral Wally and Linda’s relationship and marriage is. It’s the best “Spider-Man” book I’ve read in awhile as Wally struggles to pay bills, work his job, be a superhero, and find time for his wife and kids.

    And Linda is written with such strength and agency as a wife and mother with her own career, her own dreams and responsibilities, that it really spits all over any of the old Spidey Office excuses that marriage makes Peter too old or unremarkable or unrelatable, just because the dating drama is over. In Adams’s book, Linda is important. She’s got her own frustrations, her own fears, her own struggles, balanced against the understanding and joys of being married to a superhero who is such a good man but doesn’t always put her first in his life (hard to when “saving the world” is a daily responsibility). But they’re written with such love and care that their marriage absolutely, positively ENHANCES the book and characters. It is a better comic - and they are better characters - with this status quo.

    I boggles my mind that Spidey Office continues to feel differently. Having a partner in your corner is a boon for almost any superhero, and for Peter that absolutely was MJ at her best.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    I enjoyed Adams' run though I found Linda with powers a bit too much and was happy that was just a one-off .

    Nick Spencer showed you can write a good run with a mature, capable, Peter and him and MJ together even if she's not even consistently in the book (but she still has impact even when she's gone).
    Quote Originally Posted by Garlador View Post
    Honestly, that's exactly how I would have done it with MJ too. Linda getting powers was designed as an intentional temporary thing, and the reason she even had them was due to a life-changing event that brought her and Wally closer together. Her losing those powers has also let her better understand the world from her husband's perspective - how fast life goes by with him, and how difficult it is to slow down and enjoy the quiet moments. Si Spurrier's done a decent job tackling her postpartum along with the loss of those powers, as she better grasps just how "lacking" she is in comparison to a hero with godlike superspeed, and the alienation she feels having only just sampled a glimpse of his world. And yet he doesn't view her as inferior or a burden; she's what drives him onward and makes life worth the living.

    In a better timeline, with a better status quo, I would have loved this same arc to be applied to Mary Jane and Peter. And maybe in a better future, we can get someone like Adams to write the couple and their marriage from this same interesting perspective. One day.
    All of this. So much.
    The spider is always on the hunt.

  11. #821

  12. #822
    Formerly Assassin Spider Huntsman Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Posts
    21,605

    Default

    Stegman drawing Mary Jane was one of the better parts of the Superior Spider-Man launch, at least in my view.
    The spider is always on the hunt.

  13. #823
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    116,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Huntsman Spider View Post
    Stegman drawing Mary Jane was one of the better parts of the Superior Spider-Man launch, at least in my view.
    The art was great. The content...eh.

  14. #824
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    496

    Default

    The MJ and Paul stuff this week is blurgh. Truly awful

  15. #825
    Really Feeling It! Kevinroc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    13,410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coop View Post
    The MJ and Paul stuff this week is blurgh. Truly awful
    For the health of this thread we don't talk about such things around these parts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •