How about offering some actual leadership feats instead of pointless **** like popularity? Also, given that you like to use shows so much in your arguments who do you think most people think is the X-Men leader? No one associates X-Men leader with Storm, your arguments are not only dumb but straight up delusional.
No, I'm sorry, I don't agree. I can think of way worse periods for mutants that have nothing to do with Wanda. Honestly, I never understood the big deal about Decimation and its effect on mutants. Most of the relevant ones got their powers back and is it really such a big deal if no more mutants are being born?
Ironically enough even when Wanda wanted to fix it and was trying to do so, she was sabotaged there. And shouldn't that tell you something about the hypocrisy of this situation that if she's so evil and irredeemable, why would Scott sign on to a plan utilizing her as per Bishop's plan? Is she suddenly less evil because she's taking out the greater evil? If Scott has so many reasons to feel victimized by her and consider her irredeemable, why involve her at all? That sounds like a big disaster waiting to happen.
Like, it’s not even worth discussing because she’s not even on the same level as him, I can’t imagine Scott following her lead while Storm has worked under him and she has so many anti feats like abandoning the Morlocks, IvX, etc to even be considered, it’s actually ridiculous to compare mutantkind’s savior to Storm.
Sinister was introduced in UXM when Scott wasn't even on the team. He was an X-Men villain linked to the Marauders and Mutant Massacre first and foremost. He is not just a Cyclops villain. Also, as I posted some pages back, we see Scott at the end of the game at the mutant village so he very easily could be one of Sinister's mutant captives like Forge is confirmed to be.
How is Jean cucking him in a media where she hasn't even met Scott? Also how did Insomniac give Wolverine Scott's story. I actually went back through the leaks to make sure how accurate these accusations were and reading the story, it's basically just Wolverine Origins but swapping out Romulus (a character nobody cares for) with Sinister (who was primed to be the big bad of the FoX-Men movies).
Also from a logistical POV, it makes sense to use Sinister. He's all about genetic experimentation and discarding mutant lives for their powers and how they can increase his own power and knowledge. Wolverine is every mad scientist's ideal test subject, hence Weapon X. If you are in the business of weaponizing mutants, as Sinister is with his Marauders like Sabretooth and Riptide, then Wolverine is exactly who you would want. His healing factor promises immortality which even in TAS, is what Sinister wanted more than anything.
Sinister has more connections to Scott than any other X-Man. They're relationship has been the forefront of many stories. Sabretooth didn't even appear in an X-Men comic for the first time yet he's Logan's number one enemy. I thought you once liked Cyclops but it's becoming more clear now that you just want him to be there, do nothing and have no personality and story arc for his own