Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Extraordinary Member Gaastra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    8,438

    Default Mickey mouse trap horror movie trailer

    Horror movie cheaply made filmed before he went pd but releasing after. Blah. Can't be creative and make a fantasy family film. Cheap horror blood and honey rip-off. Blah.


  2. #2
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    12,648

    Default

    It begins.......

  3. #3
    The Superior One Celgress's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,830

    Default

    I want a Micky porno.
    "So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."

  4. #4
    Extraordinary Member Gaastra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    8,438

  5. #5
    Mighty Member Zauriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    1,770

    Default

    the trailer looks good. It makes me glad Mickey Mouse entered public domain.

  6. #6
    Sailing the seas Chris Lang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,635

    Default

    I'm not sure about this. Just because you can make a horror movie based on a family-friendly property that recently entered the public domain, it doesn't mean you should. Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey was, aside from the animated intro giving the backstory, just a cheap badly-done, misogynistic slasher movie filled with tropes people got sick and tired of over three decades ago, relying solely on the name recognition of Winnie the Pooh.

    I'm pretty sure Mickey's Mouse Trap will probably be mediocre at best, with only the fact that its slasher wears a Mickey Mouse mask distinguishing it from other cheap horror films.

    Granted, one DOES have to make their product different from Disney's so that no one will mistake it for a Disney production. And yes, horror is one way to do that. Disney's Winnie the Pooh doing what Blood and Honey's Pooh does is about as likely to happen as Superman snorting Kryptonite.

    But it's still unimaginative, lazy, and cheap. It's relying on name recognition instead of putting actual real effort into a product.

  7. #7
    Extraordinary Member thwhtGuardian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    7,631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Lang View Post
    I'm not sure about this. Just because you can make a horror movie based on a family-friendly property that recently entered the public domain, it doesn't mean you should. Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey was, aside from the animated intro giving the backstory, just a cheap badly-done, misogynistic slasher movie filled with tropes people got sick and tired of over three decades ago, relying solely on the name recognition of Winnie the Pooh.

    I'm pretty sure Mickey's Mouse Trap will probably be mediocre at best, with only the fact that its slasher wears a Mickey Mouse mask distinguishing it from other cheap horror films.

    Granted, one DOES have to make their product different from Disney's so that no one will mistake it for a Disney production. And yes, horror is one way to do that. Disney's Winnie the Pooh doing what Blood and Honey's Pooh does is about as likely to happen as Superman snorting Kryptonite.

    But it's still unimaginative, lazy, and cheap. It's relying on name recognition instead of putting actual real effort into a product.
    Unimaginative, lazy films get made all the time though. Life goes on, and maybe something better gets done with Mickey later.
    Looking for a friendly place to discuss comic books? Try The Classic Comics Forum!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •