Page 131 of 163 FirstFirst ... 3181121127128129130131132133134135141 ... LastLast
Results 1,951 to 1,965 of 2439
  1. #1951
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WontonGirl View Post
    Why would it not?

    Are you talking about what they are talking about in this article?

    https://www.thewrap.com/fox-broadcas...n-gary-newman/
    No just watching that promo, I just thought that the Joker character doesn't exactly work with Disney's image.

  2. #1952
    Post Editing OCD Confuzzled's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Swingin' Above Ya
    Posts
    12,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    I can't tell if her hair's red or if it's just the lighting .

    Oh and now when she's aged even more she kisses Bruce. Is he even 18 yet? I feel like that's kind of problematic given there's even more of an age difference now.
    Maybe it will be a very subtle and dark shade of red? I dunno.

    Anyway yeah, kissing Lil Bruce is too much. It seems like the showrunners want to avoid criticisms of involving a woman who is still mentally a small girl with an adult man, so they ran to the other extreme and inadvertently ended up with an adult woman actress kissing a little boy. Wacky show, why didn't they just introduce a whole new adult Poison Ivy if they wanted her grown up instead of creating the most awkward character arc in television history?

    Quote Originally Posted by buck135 View Post
    No just watching that promo, I just thought that the Joker character doesn't exactly work with Disney's image.
    I think one of the reasons Disney is acquiring Fox is so that they have a separate division that can produce more adult content. It used to be Touchstone Pictures before this, but Fox is a much more known brand.

    I think the bigger issue could that this is a show by DC, the biggest competitor of one of Disney's own major brands. The network could drop Gotham but it could always go to The CW (like Supergirl) or DC's new streaming service (like Young Justice).

  3. #1953
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,453

    Default

    Seriously, **** Disney. Having X-Men and FF in the MCU cannot possibly be worth creating an all-encompassing media monopoly that holds licenses to just about everything ever created in perpetuity.

  4. #1954
    Mighty Member WontonGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    Seriously, **** Disney. Having X-Men and FF in the MCU cannot possibly be worth creating an all-encompassing media monopoly that holds licenses to just about everything ever created in perpetuity.
    Well said! This is getting ridiculous.

  5. #1955
    Extraordinary Member TheCape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Venezuela
    Posts
    8,641

    Default

    That mouse is going to dominate all us

  6. #1956
    Astonishing Member sakuyamons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    2,683

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCape View Post
    That mouse is going to dominate all us
    Yeah

    But hopefully WB will fight for Gotham, it’s bat-related after all.

  7. #1957
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    Seriously, **** Disney. Having X-Men and FF in the MCU cannot possibly be worth creating an all-encompassing media monopoly that holds licenses to just about everything ever created in perpetuity.
    Uh, I don't think DC is going to necessarily be swallowed up Disney/Marvel. Even if Fox keeps producing the Gotham TV show, it doesn't mean Disney/Marvel suddenly owns the Bat-family, nor does it likely mean that Disney/Marvel has licensing rights to make any Batman movies or TV shows that it bloody well pleases, thankyouverymuch. I doubt WB/DC made a deal with Fox to license Gotham that was anywhere near as stupid/desperate as the one Marvel once made to license the FF and X-Men for films/video all those years ago.

  8. #1958
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    Uh, I don't think DC is going to necessarily be swallowed up Disney/Marvel. Even if Fox keeps producing the Gotham TV show, it doesn't mean Disney/Marvel suddenly owns the Bat-family, nor does it likely mean that Disney/Marvel has licensing rights to make any Batman movies or TV shows that it bloody well pleases, thankyouverymuch. I doubt WB/DC made a deal with Fox to license Gotham that was anywhere near as stupid/desperate as the one Marvel once made to license the FF and X-Men for films/video all those years ago.
    As part of the deal to remaster and release the '60's TV show on DVD/blu-ray, Fox was able to produce and air Gotham. They own the rights to Gotham as well as the 60's TV show and movie. If this merger happens, Disney will own them.

    I recall several Star Wars shows and video games were permanently shelved once Lucasfilm was sold to Mickey which is why I wonder about the fate of Gotham.

  9. #1959

    Default

    I just bought one of my Christmas gifts. It's a 1:10 scale statue by ArtFX (Kotobukiya). A nice, straightforward depiction of the late 90s Poison Ivy. It retails for usually under $75. The leaf wrap is removable.

    IMG_0010.jpg

  10. #1960
    Mighty Member WontonGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    That looks so cool! I tend to like this outfit the best

  11. #1961
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    23

    Default

    For anyone interested this is a small review of the Silent Screams Poison ivy story from the New Talent Showcase.
    https://wearepoisonivyleague.tumblr....hts-new-talent

    Mr Goingback also clears up the reason why Ivy "doesn't care about the kids".

  12. #1962
    Mighty Member WontonGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rosenrose View Post
    For anyone interested this is a small review of the Silent Screams Poison ivy story from the New Talent Showcase.
    https://wearepoisonivyleague.tumblr....hts-new-talent

    Mr Goingback also clears up the reason why Ivy "doesn't care about the kids".
    It was a cool review. I also went to the author's Twitter page and he is promoting his story very heavily.

  13. #1963
    Post Editing OCD Confuzzled's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Swingin' Above Ya
    Posts
    12,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deadly Garden View Post
    I just bought one of my Christmas gifts. It's a 1:10 scale statue by ArtFX (Kotobukiya). A nice, straightforward depiction of the late 90s Poison Ivy. It retails for usually under $75. The leaf wrap is removable.

    IMG_0010.jpg
    She's perfectly lovely.

    Quote Originally Posted by rosenrose View Post
    For anyone interested this is a small review of the Silent Screams Poison ivy story from the New Talent Showcase.
    https://wearepoisonivyleague.tumblr....hts-new-talent

    Mr Goingback also clears up the reason why Ivy "doesn't care about the kids".
    Neat review!

  14. #1964
    Death becomes you Osiris-Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    6,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    Uh, I don't think DC is going to necessarily be swallowed up Disney/Marvel. Even if Fox keeps producing the Gotham TV show, it doesn't mean Disney/Marvel suddenly owns the Bat-family, nor does it likely mean that Disney/Marvel has licensing rights to make any Batman movies or TV shows that it bloody well pleases, thankyouverymuch. I doubt WB/DC made a deal with Fox to license Gotham that was anywhere near as stupid/desperate as the one Marvel once made to license the FF and X-Men for films/video all those years ago.
    Fox doesn't produce Gotham. DC Entertainment and Warner Bros. Television produces Gotham. And Warner Bros. Television Distribution distributes Gotham. Fox just airs original episodes.
    DC and WB own all rights to the show and the characters. WB's only agreement with Fox was that WB would only air the Batman characters on Gotham. And that Oliver Queen was allowed
    to talk about Bruce Wayne on Arrow means that it isn't totally iron clad. Plus it was Warner Bros., not Fox, that sold the video rights for Gotham to Netflix.

  15. #1965
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Osiris-Rex View Post
    Fox doesn't produce Gotham. DC Entertainment and Warner Bros. Television produces Gotham. And Warner Bros. Television Distribution distributes Gotham. Fox just airs original episodes.
    DC and WB own all rights to the show and the characters. WB's only agreement with Fox was that WB would only air the Batman characters on Gotham. And that Oliver Queen was allowed
    to talk about Bruce Wayne on Arrow means that it isn't totally iron clad. Plus it was Warner Bros., not Fox, that sold the video rights for Gotham to Netflix.
    Thanks, I didn't know that. Fox does however own the '60's Batman show and movie though, right?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •