Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 53
  1. #31
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikekerr3 View Post
    Becasue when it is a state acting it is either a act of war or a crime against humanity. Just like state sanction executions are not normal called premeditated murders even though they are.
    So is that great irony?
    To punish a murder what is being used is murder of the murderer.

  2. #32
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikekerr3 View Post
    Becasue when it is a state acting it is either a act of war or a crime against humanity. Just like state sanction executions are not normal called premeditated murders even though they are.
    State terrorism is a thing that is real though.

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
    Good point. Many rebels and insurgents use terrorism, even when they're on the "right side". The Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism, I'd say, although a pretty fluffy one.
    No one got hurt at the boston tea party. The only people who got hurt were some fancy boys who didn't have anything to wash down their crumpets with.

  4. #34
    BANNED Mikekerr3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    3,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
    State terrorism is a thing that is real though.
    St5ate supported terrorism though intermediaries is what that term means

  5. #35
    BANNED Mikekerr3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    3,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saul_on_the_road_to_damascus View Post
    No one got hurt at the boston tea party. The only people who got hurt were some fancy boys who didn't have anything to wash down their crumpets with.
    No but some of the tax collector who were tarred and feathered by that same group dies( not an unusual result) and their homes were burnt.

  6. #36
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by saul_on_the_road_to_damascus View Post
    No one got hurt at the boston tea party. The only people who got hurt were some fancy boys who didn't have anything to wash down their crumpets with.
    Yes but still there was terrorism used against Great Britain by the United States.

  7. #37
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikekerr3 View Post
    St5ate supported terrorism though intermediaries is what that term means
    It does not.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism

    First line...

  8. #38
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikekerr3 View Post
    No but some of the tax collector who were tarred and feathered by that same group dies( not an unusual result) and their homes were burnt.
    Yes the whole homes burnt no doubt with the political objective to gain freedom from Great Britain was terrorism.

  9. #39
    BANNED Mikekerr3's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    3,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon View Post
    Yes the whole homes burnt no doubt with the political objective to gain freedom from Great Britain was terrorism.
    They were not even talking about freedom from Great Rritain at the time, that came years later.

    It was a complaint about taxes and representation, for the main characters involved mostly about taxes reprisal for getting caught smuggling.

    And the murders and arson qwere clearly terrorism, since the cause doesn't make a difference in whether it was terrorism or not

  10. #40
    Mighty Member Tupiaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Right behind you
    Posts
    1,587

    Default

    OK. I clearly got this topic derail way too much. Maybe it is time to get back on track. We now both have a definition of terrorism and state terrorism. It is better to stop it before it gets too ugly.

  11. #41
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,442

    Default

    Wasn't Khan in the last Star Trek a terrorist? It's not really a new thing. "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

  12. #42
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikekerr3 View Post
    They were not even talking about freedom from Great Rritain at the time, that came years later.

    It was a complaint about taxes and representation, for the main characters involved mostly about taxes reprisal for getting caught smuggling.

    And the murders and arson qwere clearly terrorism, since the cause doesn't make a difference in whether it was terrorism or not
    Ok but still it was terrorism.

  13. #43
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CliffHanger2 View Post
    Wasn't Khan in the last Star Trek a terrorist? It's not really a new thing. "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."
    Makes me think of one mans trash is another mans treasure.
    As for khan I can't say since I haven't seen Star Trek movies with except some of the second, and the reboot first one.

  14. #44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MRP View Post
    Why does this surprise people? Comic book villains have always reflected the zeitgeist of what frightens people...

    in the 30s it was corrupt politicians and landlords Superman was taking down, in the 40s members of the Axis powers, 50s-60's commies and people using science to create horrors, 70s it was establishment types who were corrupt and evil, 80s corporate raiders and drug dealers, and so on and so forth. The nature of villains change to reflects the times and what it is people consider villainous. If you don't see that, you haven't looked at comics in the context of their history and development...it's what comics do.

    -M
    This. From Nazi's to Communists to today's terrorists...

  15. #45
    Astonishing Member Ghost Rider TheHellfireDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,993

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by md62 View Post
    This. From Nazi's to Communists to today's terrorists...
    Maybe it surprises people because terrorism didn't get the amount of exposure and attention it did until after 9/11/2001

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •