And, once again, you can blame editorial for some of this.
Someone could have said, "Naw dude, that won't work"
If you take the monarchy away, I don't know how you give it back in the future. Most comic book things can simply be put back rather easily. But RE-establishing a monarchy? I don't see how that would work
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
There aren't 300K regular readers of cape comics period anymore. Maybe in 1995 there was but not now.
It took the combined efforts of both DC and Marvel's summer crossover specials, a Batman special issue and number ones from Punisher AND Captain America to
knock Black Panther down to number 9 in the charts.
Where it beat out Spider Man, of all things.
I can't see Marvel being anything but really happy about this. Especially since not even Bendis can keep Iron Man in the top 10 these days.
And Ellis is failing with Karnak.
Of course Ellis and Coates have the same problem of slow collaborators.
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
Exactly.
The delays are likely just Stelfreeze.
If anything, these sales probably give Coates a license to do whatever the hell he wants.
Marvel basically has a few "titles" that always exist, always seem to get rebooted rather fast even if they "fail"
Avengers
X-Men (2 generally)
Captain America
Thor
Iron Man
Hulk
Wolverine
Spider-Man (Parker)
Deadpool
Punisher
Daredevil
If Coates is able to add Black Panther to that list by keeping sales north of 40K... Marvel ain't gonna give two shits about what he does.
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
I get why people would be worried about BP's status quo. Especially since the status quos of pretty much every major Marvel hero is radically altered....
Buuut, outside of Shuri retaking the mantle in some form, I really doubt the change everyone is expected will happen and/or be lasting. I mean, none of us are new to this.
And as for the function of the Doras changing, it's changed every major run since introduction, so again, I don't mind.
"Race is a social construct, they say. And I remind them that money is a social construct, too. Social constructs have power." — DeRay Mckesson
There have been plenty of critics critiquing his book, and overall I'd say his reviews were positive. And I'm sure plenty of people at marvel have given their 2 cents.
Ultimately though you don't want Internet posting boards to dictate your story. The audience votes with text wallet.
Status quo usually bounces back regardless of what a specific writer chooses to do. There are exceptions ... a generally speaking the guys we see today in large part are in a similar spot to where they were when Stan and Jack first started with them. For better or for worse comics tend to revert to status quo soone or later.
Think is that T'Challa leading his people is only so interesting when his people are 99% faceless redshirts. And Shuri.
Say what you will about DC's Atlantis, but at least there's Mera and 2 Aqualads and possibly an Aquagirl (I lose track of them) to give a damn about.
If Wakanda were to become a democracy, at least the book would probably get a new supporting cast member out of it: A Prime Minister.
And that would be a by defintion different character beat than the "loyal but somewhat argumentative assistant" that we usually get.
Depending on the situation, a Prime Minister might not have to listen to T'challa at all.
The reason many of us are saying we feel like he doesn't like the character is because in virtually all the interviews he's done he mostly talks about what he doesn't like about the character and what needs to be changed. He also said T'Challa wasn't on his radar as a kid. Ultimately none of that should be a issue, but so far that's been coming out a lot in his writing.
I have no problem with Coates exploring issues of sexism/misogyny in Wakanda. What I have a problem with is the lead of the book being painted as part of the problem or turning a blind eye to such issues. I've long said that I want to see T'Challa's supporting cast (particularly the women) fleshed out and given more to do, but there's a way to do that without making T'Challa look like an ineffectual leader or making him feel like an afterthought in his own book.
I think Coates severely underestimated just how badly many long time fans needed a story showing T'Challa as a legit superpower within the Marvel universe. Some elements of this story being told would never sit well with some people, but it'd have been MUCH easier to swallow if this wasn't the first arc and if the last story featuring T'Challa didn't end on such a hopeful note.
And you're spot on about Coates possibly trying too hard to ground certain aspects of T'Challa and Wakanda in realism. Obviously some things wouldn't work in the real world, but this isn't the real world. Some of the things Coates has said about the mythology is the same crap we've dealt with unfans saying for years.
I'm giving this book till issue 5 to hook me in and ease my concerns. If things are still going down this path by then i'm dropping the book. I'm not going to campaign against it, or constantly rag on it, I'll just stop reading unless I hear things have turned around from someone whose opinion I trust.
I know some people don't like Ultimates because T'Challa doesn't get much attention, but I actually love that book. I never expected T'Challa to be a central figure in that book, especially in that first arc, but what they've done with him so far is still really good.
They've had characters like that in previous runs, it's just that nobody bothers to use them consistently. A resurrected M'Baku, Hunter, Zawavari, and Shuri all could have played the role of political foils for T'Challa.
T'Challa rule over Wakanda has never been as absolute as some make it seem sometimes. It had been established decades ago that there were ways to challenge T'Challa's authority.
This is true, but lets not act as if T'Challa didn't JUST get the title of King back. This also isn't just him being replaced in the role, Coates has been hinting at a fundamental change to Wakandan society. Stuff like that is harder to roll back, especially on the heels of a line wide quasi reboot.
The role of the Dora Milaje has been ever evolving since Priest introduced them. The only concerns I had with Priest's usage of them was that he was initially talking about them and making it seem like he couldn't fathom that T'Challa wouldn't abuse or take advantage of that situation. Priest did a lot of make it clear how T'Challa felt about the Dora Milaje.
The biggest underestimating Coates has made in tackling Black Panther is his assumption that he doesn't have to show the world how great T'Challa is a hero and King. I think him having that view has informed his decision to deconstruct Wakanda and T'Challa yet again, and thinking he can be shown in this light without any significant ramifications.
Black Panther Discord Server: https://discord.gg/SA3hQerktm
T'challa's Greatest Comic Book Feats: http://blackpanthermarvel.blogspot.c...her-feats.html
I'm very slowly starting to lean that direction as well. I'll obviously remain a BP fan and will comment more about BP books than others, but...all we can do is make our voices be heard, vote with our wallets, and hope for the best.
It's quite ironic. The book is selling, its getting good reviews overall, and the BP book is as popular as it has ever been (due to many factors, of course). On paper, its almost everything BP fans wanted. Yet, we are where we are.
The good news is that it will be the MCU that will be setting the status quo in the eyes of...well, the world basically. And so far, BP in the MCU is headed in the right direction.
Last edited by Realdealholy; 06-20-2016 at 09:28 AM.