Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    35

    Default So as someone who has read comics for about four years...

    ...I was quite surprised to discover that Supergirl hadn't actually been Supergirl for about fifteen years.

    I started reading at the new 52 as it seemed like a good jumping on point. I did go back and start reading some other comics recently and discovered that Supergirl had actually died in Crisis. I don't know much about this and am still reading up but it explains Death of Superman why there was a big grey mass that became Superman. Who was that? D:

    Did the real Supergirl really only return in New 52, over 20 years after originally dieing?

    I've only read for four years but feel like I am never going to know enough or stop learning things

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    The "real" Supergirl, a.k.a Kara Zor-El actually did come back before the New 52 started, in the old Superman/Batman title in 2004. Before then though the idea had gone through a couple different unique incarnations to adhere to the concept after the Crisis that Superman could be the only Kryptonian. At first she was a shape-shifting being of ectoplasm from a pocket universe that Superman had visited and whom came back with him called Matrix. After that the same being merged with an Earthling named Linda Danvers which started a whole new direction for the character. Eventually though that title was canceled, and the decision was finally made to bring back a Supergirl who was legitimately Superman's cousin again, and Kara Zor-El returned to comics canon when her ship crash landed in Gotham City in Superman/Batman #8.

  3. #3
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Actually come to think of it, I might have read the issue where the ship crashes in to Gotham. I can't remember how or where but that feels familiar.

  4. #4
    Fantastic Member butterfingers158's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    307

    Default

    You may have seen the animated movie based on the arc, Superman/Batman:Apocalypse

  5. #5
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Yeah, the true kryptonian Supergirl returned in the last 10 years in the Superman/Batman book as mentioned above. Personally, I like the concept of Superman's cousin as Supergirl rather than the Pocket Universe shape-shifting creature though Peter Davids's Supergirl was fun.

  6. #6
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    It allowed for some creative twists on old concepts but none of them proved as charming or effective as the original idea. The no-other-Kryptonians edict, while I understand where it came from and even supported giving a try, ultimately proved a failure. The gains were not worth the losses.

  7. #7
    I'm at least a C-Lister! exile001's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The Mothcave
    Posts
    3,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sacred Knight View Post
    It allowed for some creative twists on old concepts but none of them proved as charming or effective as the original idea. The no-other-Kryptonians edict, while I understand where it came from and even supported giving a try, ultimately proved a failure. The gains were not worth the losses.
    I disagree.

    The only real loss was Zod, and the two twists we got on him were fine. Both times he actually felt like a threat. I think Peter David's Supergirl run was as popular as any Kara Zor-El era, and I vastly prefer the multicultural Kandor.

    The main losses, to my mind, were contrivance and thousands of nameless other Kryptonians.

    Since bringing them all back, have we really gained anything?
    "Has Sariel summoned you here, Azrael? Have you come to witness the miracle of your brethren arriving on Earth?"

    "I WILL MIX THE ASHES OF YOUR BONES WITH SALT AND USE THEM TO ENSURE THE EARTH THE TEMPLARS TILLED NEVER BEARS FRUIT AGAIN!"

    "*sigh* I hoped it was for the miracle."

    Dan Watters' Azrael was incredible, a constant delight and perhaps too good for this world (but not the Forth). For the love of St. Dumas, DC, give us more!!!

  8. #8
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I think all of the alternative methods of these ideas paled in comparison to the Kryptonian originals. Don't get me wrong, you can go too far with the Kryptonians if you go nuts, but you just have to reign it in and not go nuts. But give me Kara Zor-El, give me Zod, Non and Faora and/or Ursa, give me Krypto, and give me classic Kandor. I did like the idea of a multicultural Kandor, but only if the actual city was the actual Kryptonian Kandor. None of the substitutes ever beat those.

    And yeah, I'd say since bringing all that back the mythos gained a whole lot. It gained a stronger physical connection between Superman and Krypton, one which was sorely lacking post-Crisis. And granted that too was by design, but the design proved ultimately inferior.
    Last edited by Sacred Knight; 09-30-2014 at 03:18 AM.

  9. #9
    I'm at least a C-Lister! exile001's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The Mothcave
    Posts
    3,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sacred Knight View Post
    We'll just have to agree to disagree then. I think all of the alternative methods of these ideas paled in comparison to the Kryptonian originals. Don't get me wrong, you can go too far with the Kryptonians if you go nuts, but you just have to reign it in and not go nuts. But give me Kara Zor-El, give me Zod, Non and Faora and/or Ursa, give me Krypto, and give me classic Kandor. I did like the idea of a multicultural Kandor, but only if the actual city was the actual Kryptonian Kandor. None of the substitutes ever beat those.

    And yeah, I'd say since bringing all that back the mythos gained a whole lot. It gained a stronger physical connection between Superman and Krypton, one which was sorely lacking post-Crisis. And granted that too was by design, but the design proved ultimately inferior.
    I think I see where are differences lie. I want Kryton a thing that is gone and in the past. An ideal of what Kal-El's life could have been but can never have, where you prefer a more direct connection to that lost past. Is that correct?

    While still agreeing to disagree, I'd actually keep Krypto. He's pretty unique as a character and the fact that he somehow works in a modern context is superb.

    I also liked the Eradicator device (prior to getting a body) from post-Crisis (not that god-awful New-52 thing).
    "Has Sariel summoned you here, Azrael? Have you come to witness the miracle of your brethren arriving on Earth?"

    "I WILL MIX THE ASHES OF YOUR BONES WITH SALT AND USE THEM TO ENSURE THE EARTH THE TEMPLARS TILLED NEVER BEARS FRUIT AGAIN!"

    "*sigh* I hoped it was for the miracle."

    Dan Watters' Azrael was incredible, a constant delight and perhaps too good for this world (but not the Forth). For the love of St. Dumas, DC, give us more!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •