Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Ferro View Post
    He is only fiscally conservative while being socially liberal.
    And sure, lots of liberals describe themselves as "fiscally conservative," really just meaning "responsible; not a reckless spender." But he says he defintely preferred Romeny over Obama, which makes him sound like he really does tilt to the right.

    Also, I'm not sure I'd want to vote for someone who says "it’s something that I would do on a part-time basis." I can sympathize with preferring candidates who have had non-political careers to candidates who have been career politicians--put once someone is in Congress or in another major elected official, it should be a full-time job. Congress already gets little enough done without members starting to take pride in being part-timers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dupin
    At first, I was going to say that the idea of an actor having political responsabilities was preposterous. Then I remembered what country we were talking about.
    Carry on.
    I used to think it was preposterous, and as a Democrat I'm not encouraged by the Reagan example. And no one should be encouraged by the Schwarzenegger example. But I've gotten more impressed with the intelligence and understanding it usually takes to be a really good actor (which doesn't necessarily include Reagan or Schwarzenegger). If an actor has also been an activist or in some other way proven knowledgeable and capable when it comes to policy and politics, then I don't think his or her career in the arts has to be a disqualifier. Even Reagan was president of a union (the Screen Actors Guild) before he was Governor of California, so while I didn't like his policies or "know nothing" demeanor, I didn't think his career path was as ridiculous as it has sometimes been considered.
    Last edited by Silvanus; 05-08-2014 at 05:08 AM.

  2. #17
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    943

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don C View Post
    Wow, the guy meets LexRules once and all of a sudden he'll take any job to get off the convention circuit.

    --------

    Anyway, yes, he's a conservative. Here's an interview he did with (ugh) Fox News about it from last month.

    http://video.foxnews.com/v/350439791...#sp=show-clips

    Living in Southern California his whole life, I think he could win there. People seem to like electing celebrities who have no other qualifications other than being famous.
    Hey, what can I say. I have a way with people.

  3. #18
    Mighty Member Mr. Mastermind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,178

    Default

    Looking him up on his wikipedia page, he sponsored Rick Perry in 2012, and I really can't see anyone leaning to the left sponsoring Rick friggin' Perry.

    Considering the like of Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann have political power in the US, he probably won't be too bad all things considering. I mean, can anyone's political views really be worse than Rick Santorum's? You and me both know that's not physically possible.

  4. #19
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    943

    Default

    Dean will bring back the Classic Sut.


    VOTE FOR DEAN....

  5. #20
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    337

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lexrules View Post
    Dean will bring back the Classic Sut.


    VOTE FOR DEAN....
    Heh. Brilliant!

  6. #21
    Jewish & Proud Feminist Shadowcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Dept. H
    Posts
    5,596

    Default

    I wouldn't vote for him, but that's because he's a Republican and I'm a staunch Democrat.

  7. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa View Post
    A California conservative would be a North Carolina liberal. Of course, on the other hand, an American liberal would be an English conservative.
    That's not a political spectrum thing. That's a difference in terminology-- in America, "liberal" refers to the progressive movement, while in the UK and Europe, "liberal" refers more to a classical liberal. A British liberal would be more like... an American libertarian. Except far more moderate than the name implies.

  8. #23
    436 posts and counting... TheFearlessDefender89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robotman View Post
    He's starred in that horrible "evolution is a lie" bible movie. So I don't think id find myself voting for him.
    Really? Yikes!!! As an Atheist who supports evolutionary theory, that's a no go for me.
    Pull List: Harley Quinn, Superman Unchained, She-Hulk, Ms.Marvel, The Fearless Defenders (R.I.P.)
    *~ValkyrieXAnnabelle~*

  9. #24
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Judea
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FaerieGodfather View Post
    That's not a political spectrum thing. That's a difference in terminology-- in America, "liberal" refers to the progressive movement, while in the UK and Europe, "liberal" refers more to a classical liberal. A British liberal would be more like... an American libertarian. Except far more moderate than the name implies.
    There is a big difference in the entire political spectrum between the UK and America, though. America is a lot further to the right than the UK, and President Obama is called a socialist by the right here when in fact he is center right at best, besides having some common decency on LGBT issues.

    Of course, at least he's done something for somebody in that department. But he's very centrist politically and very conservative in how he handles business.

  10. #25
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Penguinopolis
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFearlessDefender89 View Post
    Really? Yikes!!! As an Atheist who supports evolutionary theory, that's a no go for me.
    You can't really "support" evolutionary theory. Evolution just exists. Supporting evolutionary theory is like supporting arithmetic. It's just how numbers work.

    If by that you mean you support shaming the people who refuse to believe in reality, I concur.
    Last edited by Penguin Truth; 05-08-2014 at 09:42 PM.

  11. #26
    Astonishing Member DieHard200904's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Backwoods of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,187

    Default

    He's not in my area, so it won't matter to me one way or another. I don't think he will get the nomination anyways.

  12. #27
    Death becomes you Osiris-Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    6,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Auguste Dupin View Post
    At first, I was going to say that the idea of an actor having political responsabilities was preposterous. Then I remembered what country we were talking about.
    Carry on.
    If Al Franken can get elected as a US Senator, and even win a second term, why not?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •