I am loving this book
I like how everything I was iffy about was actually part of the story and that he is getting to it all in the first arc
All about Si
Everyone sounds good and I'm like the banter
And I'm liking the art a lot.
I am loving this book
I like how everything I was iffy about was actually part of the story and that he is getting to it all in the first arc
All about Si
Everyone sounds good and I'm like the banter
And I'm liking the art a lot.
i whould do so many dirty things with cable
I agree with the posts where the writer is pointing out areas of consternation from "fans" and critics. It somewhat proves we need to be patient with titlestitles and allow voices to grow...we are too wanting of immediately having all laid out in a spoilerific world now (myself included). I know he is not sticking around but last issue and the upcoming issue has a higher quality quotient to me with Molina, I wish they would stick with this art style and a stronger storyteller.
Honestly, I don't care if some of the flaws of Spurrier's writing are plot relevant or not. It doesn't make them any less annoying to read through.
I like the preview and I like the book. I came to love Spurrier's writing in his Legacy run. The art I don't mind, I liked the original artist, it was fun to see something so different and yet nice. From the preview, I hope it won't be Marrow who is going to be killed even though they try to indicate that. Maybe it's false. I'd like to believe that cause I love Marrow. She is crazy and funny and doesn't give a @#$% if she dies.
I don't think there's going to be a real death. Rather I think Cable is going to "die" in the same way he did in issue #2 where he blew himself up with that spirit dude having possessed him, but somehow ended up back at the base alive and well and with no more spirit dude.
So we'll soon find out what's up with him and how he was able to survive that. My guess is clones or alternate versions plucked from different points in time or slightly alternate timelines. Something like that. We'll see.