"Blade Runner" Sequel Begins Shooting in 2015, But Ridley Scott Won't Direct

[Crimson Knight]

I didn't even like Blade Runner but I also know that it doesn't need a sequel. There's no plot reason for one, Philip K. Dick never wrote a sequel as far as I know and they'll ruin the one part of the first film I liked -- the artistic direction -- with a ton of CGI.

Well, while Dick didn't, someone else did. A number of them in fact.

His name was K.W. Jeter, and here're the names of the books and years they came out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Andr...eep%3F#Sequels

[Crimson Knight]

And glad that there's some more word on this moving forward.

Enjoyed Blade Runner, and own Blade Runner: The Final Cut on DVD. Hopefully, whether Ford or Scott return, it still has a good feel, intrigue and thrill.

Lots of creative minds, hopefully cooked something interesting up, whether from any of the three sequels, or an original concept.

Hope Ridley returns for Prometheus 2, as didn't for Aliens, and doesn't seem to be with Blade Runner 2. Like the consistency of same director, sure, look at all the different feeling Potter films, from Colombus to Cuaron to Newell to Yates.

Made for some interesting viewing though, but partially wish Yates did 4-7, instead of just 5-7, even if I was happy with GOF.