Page 171 of 176 FirstFirst ... 71121161167168169170171172173174175 ... LastLast
Results 2,551 to 2,565 of 2628
  1. #2551
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukmendes View Post
    That doesn't excuse his neglect or attitude.





    And then he wondered if rejecting Stark was part of a test, so he really still wants Stark's approval lol.
    Well of course, that’s why Peter got fed up, just making it clear that stark wasn’t being an ******* on purpose and he did care.

    Yeah, but he didn’t say it was gonna make everyone forget until he started casting it. Peter just wanted it to be like if mysterio never revealed it. But yeah both should have really thought it through.

    What’s your point with this last part? We know he actually didn’t think he was ready to be an avenger, in the next movie he’s ready to stick to being just the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man. Starks approval wasn’t the goal there that’s really peters own desires. It would be really weird for him to only say that because he thinks that’s what mister stark would want him to say And would go against the themes of the movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spidey_Legend View Post
    I only watched the first MCU SPider-Man movie so I won't talk about the other two but it truly sucks. Spidey is dumb. Too dependant in being a licker of Iron Man. The only good thing in the movie is Michael Keaton as the Vulture.

    I can understand thinking Spider-Man was dumb, he made a lot of mistakes. But being a licker of Ironman is a crazy take. When he did nothing but ignore what Tony wanted to follow what he thought was right.

    But Peter does become more competent in the other movies and pretty badass, he still uses high tech though so if that something they puts you off, I guess you might not like them. Of and Tony’s dead so he can’t even be a licker of him in those movies
    Last edited by Kman2; 02-24-2023 at 10:38 AM.

  2. #2552
    Fantastic Member Spidey_Legend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kman2 View Post
    Well of course, that’s why Peter got fed up, just making it clear that stark wasn’t being an ******* on purpose and he did care.

    Yeah, but he didn’t say it was gonna make everyone forget until he started casting it. Peter just wanted it to be like if mysterio never revealed it. But yeah both should have really thought it through.

    What’s your point with this last part? We know he actually didn’t think he was ready to be an avenger, in the next movie he’s ready to stick to being just the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man. Starks approval wasn’t the goal there that’s really peters own desires. It would be really weird for him to only say that because he thinks that’s what mister stark would want him to say And would go against the themes of the movie.



    I can understand thinking Spider-Man was dumb, he made a lot of mistakes. But being a licker of Ironman is a crazy take. When he did nothing but ignore what Tony wanted to follow what he thought was right.

    But Peter does become more competent in the other movies and pretty badass, he still uses high tech though so if that something they puts you off, I guess you might not like them. Of and Tony’s dead so he can’t even be a licker of him in those movies
    But Peter did not ignore Tony because is the correct thing to do and taking care of his responsability. He did it to get Tony's approval at the end. That's being a licker.

    Yes, the technology stuff is a big no for me but I won't say anything about the other movies.

  3. #2553
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spidey_Legend View Post
    But Peter did not ignore Tony because is the correct thing to do and taking care of his responsability. He did it to get Tony's approval at the end. That's being a licker.

    Yes, the technology stuff is a big no for me but I won't say anything about the other movies.
    He did it for multiple reasons just like peter stops the lizard or other criminals from doing bad stuff but also takes pictures of himself while doing it to make money.

    Mcu Peter wants to stop the vulture because what he’s doing is wrong and because the weapons are crazy dangerous, he’s witnessed how dangerous they are himself.
    Tony says no stay out of it. Peter feels like he’s being underestimated and wants to prove himself but he’s only going after the vulture because it’s the right and responsible thing to do.

    I don’t see how not wanting to be underestimated makes him a bootlicker. To be a bootlicker he’d have to do exactly what Tony wants to make Tony happy. Not ignoring him to do the right thing because Tony underestimates him.
    Last edited by Kman2; 02-24-2023 at 12:49 PM.

  4. #2554
    Take Me Higher The Negative Zone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Earth. (Unless I've been kidnapped by Skrulls)
    Posts
    2,500

    Default

    In the end.. Dan Slott won.

  5. #2555
    The Superior One Celgress's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,829

    Thumbs up

    I'm not sure if this is controversial but here goes -

    Injecting mysticism with the whole Spider Totem and Web of Life stuff into Spidey was the worst thing that ever happened to 616 Peter. Sure, we got a few interesting things from it such as 616 (kind of) Miles and OG concept (Universe 65 setting) Spider-Gwen, however, Peter Parker has always been a character grounded in science and so he should remain. And it opened the door for the inclusion of magical-heavy concepts like OMD, Kindred, and most recently the current run of Amazing.
    "So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."

  6. #2556
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,012

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celgress View Post
    I'm not sure if this is controversial but here goes -

    Injecting mysticism with the whole Spider Totem and Web of Life stuff into Spidey was the worst thing that ever happened to 616 Peter. Sure, we got a few interesting things from it such as 616 (kind of) Miles and OG concept (Universe 65 setting) Spider-Gwen, however, Peter Parker has always been a character grounded in science and so he should remain. And it opened the door for the inclusion of magical-heavy concepts like OMD, Kindred, and most recently the current run of Amazing.
    Yeah, as much as I enjoyed JMS' run, this was the one bit I was always a bit unsure about.
    Keep in mind that you have about as much chance of changing my mind as I do of changing yours.

  7. #2557
    Ultimate Member marhawkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    11,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celgress View Post
    I'm not sure if this is controversial but here goes -

    Injecting mysticism with the whole Spider Totem and Web of Life stuff into Spidey was the worst thing that ever happened to 616 Peter. Sure, we got a few interesting things from it such as 616 (kind of) Miles and OG concept (Universe 65 setting) Spider-Gwen, however, Peter Parker has always been a character grounded in science and so he should remain. And it opened the door for the inclusion of magical-heavy concepts like OMD, Kindred, and most recently the current run of Amazing.
    I have to agree. It's ... wonky and has resulted in some terrible storytelling.

  8. #2558
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    4,392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celgress View Post
    I'm not sure if this is controversial but here goes -

    Injecting mysticism with the whole Spider Totem and Web of Life stuff into Spidey was the worst thing that ever happened to 616 Peter. Sure, we got a few interesting things from it such as 616 (kind of) Miles and OG concept (Universe 65 setting) Spider-Gwen, however, Peter Parker has always been a character grounded in science and so he should remain. And it opened the door for the inclusion of magical-heavy concepts like OMD, Kindred, and most recently the current run of Amazing.
    I always find it funny whenever people act like the science in Spider-Man made sense. It was always magic with the serial numbers filed off. That’s why I consider the “grounded” argument to be dumb.

  9. #2559
    Extraordinary Member Captain Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    5,999

    Default

    Nothing says science like spider (lab enhanced or not) fried by radiation and yet lives long enough to bite not ONE but (retconned) TWO folks.

    Science

    Magic

    Synonyms in comics essentially.
    "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" - Optimus Prime

  10. #2560
    The Superior One Celgress's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PCN24454 View Post
    I always find it funny whenever people act like the science in Spider-Man made sense. It was always magic with the serial numbers filed off. That’s why I consider the “grounded” argument to be dumb.
    Heck, it is science-based in so far as anything akin to Star Trek or Star Wars can be called science-based. Perhaps pseudoscience would be a better term.
    "So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."

  11. #2561
    Better than YOU! Alan2099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celgress View Post
    Heck, it is science-based in so far as anything akin to Star Trek or Star Wars can be called science-based. Perhaps pseudoscience would be a better term.
    Too bad there isn't a word for stories that use Science in Fictional ways.

  12. #2562
    The Superior One Celgress's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    11,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post
    Too bad there isn't a word for stories that use Science in Fictional ways.
    Do you mean sci-fi? Yeah, maybe I should have used that word, to begin with. Either way, the "complaint" does seem a bit nitpicking considering this is fiction we are talking about. Spidey's roots are in sci-fi, not fantasy (which tends to be more magical-based).
    "So you've come to the end now alive but dead inside."

  13. #2563
    World's Greatest Hero blackspidey2099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celgress View Post
    I'm not sure if this is controversial but here goes -

    Injecting mysticism with the whole Spider Totem and Web of Life stuff into Spidey was the worst thing that ever happened to 616 Peter. Sure, we got a few interesting things from it such as 616 (kind of) Miles and OG concept (Universe 65 setting) Spider-Gwen, however, Peter Parker has always been a character grounded in science and so he should remain. And it opened the door for the inclusion of magical-heavy concepts like OMD, Kindred, and most recently the current run of Amazing.
    I don’t like any argument that is based on “X has always been this way and so it should always be this way”. Spider-Man is a versatile enough character to work in any setting or any type of story, as long as the writing is good. JMS handled the mystical elements great, so just because Wells, Spencer and Quesada weren’t able to do it doesn’t mean other writers shouldn’t get the chance if they think it would make for a good story.
    "Anyone can win a fight when the odds are easy! It's when the going's tough - when there seems to be no chance - that's when it counts!" - Spider-Man

  14. #2564
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    4,392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackspidey2099 View Post
    I don’t like any argument that is based on “X has always been this way and so it should always be this way”. Spider-Man is a versatile enough character to work in any setting or any type of story, as long as the writing is good. JMS handled the mystical elements great, so just because Wells, Spencer and Quesada weren’t able to do it doesn’t mean other writers shouldn’t get the chance if they think it would make for a good story.
    Yeah, that’s why I hate it when a lot of high concept stuff gets retconned like Tinkerer and Judas Traveler.

  15. #2565

    Default

    I like the concept of Peter Parker working for Stark Industries, it doesn't make him a section chief or such high promotion, how he manages his time makes him unfit for such position.

    Although.. I don't really mind the concept of Parker Industries, I think making the character grow to adjust how he handles situations and manage his time is good progress that is kinda overdue for the character.

    Quote Originally Posted by blackspidey2099 View Post
    I don’t like any argument that is based on “X has always been this way and so it should always be this way”. Spider-Man is a versatile enough character to work in any setting or any type of story, as long as the writing is good. JMS handled the mystical elements great, so just because Wells, Spencer and Quesada weren’t able to do it doesn’t mean other writers shouldn’t get the chance if they think it would make for a good story.
    While I really love how JMS handled the stuff, I'd still rather keep this level of mysticism away from Spider-Man, and would rather not see other writers indulge the idea.
    TRUTH, JUSTICE, HOPE
    That is, the heritage of the Kryptonian Warrior: Kal-El, son of Jor-El
    You like Gameboy and NDS? - My channel
    Looks like I'll have to move past gameplay footage

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •