Originally Posted by
harpier
Yeah, so before reading down a little, my mind was reeling at what you might mean by "****". I was coming up with much more graphic mad-libs.
Anyway, it seems like your question is less about which male characters are hot or, as you put it in your thread title, "sexualized" than it is about the lack of variety in bodies that are idealized. I would argue that this particular idealization includes sexual appeal, or is at least certainly not exclusive of it. If your observation is that Marvel's superhero men don't resemble the bodies of most male models—by which I assume you mean mostly fashion models—it's an interesting one. They aren't often sleekly chiseled, they rarely show off backsides or legs, they over-accentuate the chest and arms, and they prioritize bulk as an aesthetic choice. But even Marvel's superhero women don't resemble most female models either. They're also idealized in very particular ways, but they're far more inclined to have fuller chests and hips, stronger shoulders and arms, and generally a more Amazonian physique. I absolutely agree that female comics characters are far more likely to be overtly sexualized than male characters, especially in the most egregious forms, but I think several current (or recently concluded) Marvel series are starting to make their male characters objects of sexual desire both within the comics themselves—Kate Bishop catching Clint Barton slipping into a shirt while sliding into her car in Fraction's Hawkeye comes to mind—and for their readers. They might be beefy, but you'd need a lot to convince me that Daredevil under Waid's tenure and Thor under Aaron aren't gorgeous and often enough appreciated within the comic for their beauty.