View Poll Results: Batman: Hush issue #608-619 Dec '02 to Nov '03 by Jeph Loeb & Jim Lee / What is your verdict?

Voters
80. You may not vote on this poll
  • 5-Stars: Easily One of The Greatest work by a creative team I have ever read

    10 12.50%
  • 4-Stars: This was really good

    28 35.00%
  • 3-Stars: It was okay

    22 27.50%
  • 2-Stars: I was more underwhelmed than anything

    14 17.50%
  • 1-Star: I'm trying to find my lighter or match so I can set this on fire

    6 7.50%
  • No Comment: I haven't read it, or I really have no opinion(s) whatsoever

    0 0%
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 116
  1. #31
    ✯Man of Tomorrow✯ Jphu8414's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Metropolis
    Posts
    187

    Default

    One of my personal favorite Batman stories and the absolute best from Jeph Loeb in my opinion

  2. #32
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,983

    Default

    Spoiled by one cringe-worthy sonnet from Bruce to Tim: "Your movements are so VIBRANT!" Gawd. Don't need Ipecac Syrup to make me hurl.

  3. #33
    non-super & non-hero jump's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,039

    Default

    My girlfriend was complaining about the art the other day, we were in the pub with a couple of our friends and she points out that Catwoman's shoes are horrible looking and impractical which led to a 4 person debate.

    I get that it's good for showing off the Bat-verse but the story itself does nothing for me, I do like how it's one of the few stories that show Bats and Catwoman actually trying to have a relationship rather than just flirting/tension.

  4. #34
    Amazing Member Hellblazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Back when I got in to comics, I asked for a list of batman comics that I could read. I started from year one,long halloween, dark victory.......etc and I read the last one which was Hush. To me, it was so hyped by the recommenders that I considered it to be ground-breaking. By the time I got done with the story, It felt like an okay story with great art and lots of cameos.

  5. #35
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,080

    Default

    Mediocre, but pretty art and occasional nice moments.

    It's essentially Jeph Loeb saying "what if I did the same thing I did in Long Halloween and then again in Dark Victory... but with Jim Lee!?"

  6. #36
    Astonishing Member dancj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,568

    Default

    Weak story, terrible villain, stiff art.

    Nah.

    It passed the time just well enough to get a 2 from me.

  7. #37
    Getting my Geek on! Big Geek's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Mount Doom, CT
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by !Pharozonk! View Post
    It's like watching a big blockbuster: you know how the movie is going to end and the plot is somewhat cliche in places, but its a fun ride and looks damn good while doing it.
    That's my take as well.

    It's a very fun popcorn flick in the form of a comic book.

  8. #38
    Incredible Member Lorendiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoneNecromancer View Post
    It's essentially Jeph Loeb saying "what if I did the same thing I did in Long Halloween and then again in Dark Victory... but with Jim Lee!?"
    I disagree. In TLH and DV, there was a serial killer running loose killing lots and lots of people, month after month, for a year.

    "Hush" strikes me as a rather different type of story. I'm having trouble remembering more than one actual death -- poor Harold, suddenly popping up out of thin air just in time to get killed at the end of Part 11. (Near as I can tell, we hadn't even seen Harold in any previous Batman stories for about 5 years before that, so who knew he was even still living in Gotham, much less was a viable suspect for the role of "the inside man who's been bribed to betray Batman's trust"?) Heck, until the final installment of the 12-parter, Batman didn't even know he was supposed to be looking for a mysterious villain who used the alias of "Hush"! That's rather different from the way the question "Who is Holiday?" kept coming up all through "The Long Halloween," and "Who is the Hang Man?" kept coming up all the way through "Dark Victory."

  9. #39
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    England
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lorendiac View Post
    I disagree. In TLH and DV, there was a serial killer running loose killing lots and lots of people, month after month, for a year.

    "Hush" strikes me as a rather different type of story. I'm having trouble remembering more than one actual death -- poor Harold, suddenly popping up out of thin air just in time to get killed at the end of Part 11. (Near as I can tell, we hadn't even seen Harold in any previous Batman stories for about 5 years before that, so who knew he was even still living in Gotham, much less was a viable suspect for the role of "the inside man who's been bribed to betray Batman's trust"?) Heck, until the final installment of the 12-parter, Batman didn't even know he was supposed to be looking for a mysterious villain who used the alias of "Hush"! That's rather different from the way the question "Who is Holiday?" kept coming up all through "The Long Halloween," and "Who is the Hang Man?" kept coming up all the way through "Dark Victory."
    Agreed.

    TLH/DV are more like "Watch Bruce discover who the killer is"

    Hush is more like "Watch the killer mess with Bruce"

  10. #40
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoneNecromancer View Post
    It's essentially Jeph Loeb saying "what if I did the same thing I did in Long Halloween and then again in Dark Victory... but with Jim Lee!?"
    I agree with this, except Hush is a weak attempt to be Long Halloween. That story, while full of plotholes and iffy characterizations, has a great vibe and the art fits it. Hush feels like Loeb sat down with Jim Lee and said "what do you want to draw?" and worked around that. I appreciate it for what it is; if I had to vote based on its importance and accessibility, it would be a 3. But I hated it, and hope I never read it again.

  11. #41
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    551

    Default

    I liked that it gave The Riddler a big push and after that DC dropped the ball with The Riddler after that. I know they made him a detective, but they should have kept the ball rolling, especially since he knew Batman's secret identity.
    Last edited by Mister BoMan; 05-15-2014 at 03:19 PM.

  12. #42
    Fantastic Member EdwardNigma's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    291

    Default

    I also loved the Riddler aspect and thought Hush was a great tale.

  13. #43
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    44

    Default

    I'd stopped reading comix around the whole Azrael/Knightfall period. Years later I'm in a bookstore and I see this comix rack(!) with the 1st issue of the Batman/Hush storyline. The art peaked my interest so I bought it. It was the start of a renewed interest in comix. The story was good, not great. The artwork did it for me. Little touches like graffiti on the wall being the names of old bat-creators. I enjoyed the Nightwing/Grayson/Robin/Jason touches. And it was the source of one of my alltime favorite Batman images; the cover featuring Batman and Nightwing running along a rooftop, Lee nailed that one! Currently I'm on another comix sabbatical, waiting for the next 'great' Batman series to happen, hasn't happened for me yet.

  14. #44
    see beauty in all things. charliehustle415's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,246

    Default

    I really enjoyed it, especially as a fun summer blockbuster style read. No ridiculous crossover BS, just pure simple fun Batman. You do have to admit that at least Loeb never wrangled other writers into his arc, that's why I love all of his mini-series they are so self contained and that is so rare these days in comics.

  15. #45
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by charliehustle415 View Post
    You do have to admit that at least Loeb never wrangled other writers into his arc, that's why I love all of his mini-series they are so self contained and that is so rare these days in comics.
    That's because it was 2002. Can you imagine how huge an event Hush would be today?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •