As I see it right now, the MCU doesn't need to have three geniuses on the same team at the same time. I suppose it's personal preference so there's point in arguing that.
As I see it right now, the MCU doesn't need to have three geniuses on the same team at the same time. I suppose it's personal preference so there's point in arguing that.
I could argue the same about heavyweights, bulkmasters like Luke Cage, the Hulk and Thor, but one's on the Defenders, with only two on the Avengers, so maybe it works.
Maybe, three in the one universe isn't the problem, but on the same team? I don't know. Have more than one intelligent, and strong people, in real life, history and the planet, and I don't know if creative redundancy is such a problem, when people like Mister Freeze, Icicle, Captain Cold, Killer Frost and so on, exist in the same universe.
IIRC, Loki said that he was masquerading as Eternity when Eternity gave Pym that label of "Scientist Supreme" label in order to manipulate Pym.
Not that I'd give it much stock in the label anyway considering that there's Reed Richards, Doom, High Evolutionary, and others just a touch above him (and the feats to prove it).
Last edited by Cyke; 01-01-2015 at 04:16 AM.
We could always say the same about Doctor Strange, and say Dormammu, or Doctor Doom, or Brother Voodoo, or others, would be far more deserving.
And, feats? Man, it's not Rumbles, ya know!
No, regardless, Hank took up the title, ran with it and made it his own. It mattered, it saved people, it helped Doctor Pym and one of the Avengers teams.
But, up to people, whatever they think, Sorceror and Scientist wise. A stroke of a pen can make ANYONE Supreme. A retcon here, or a rewrite here... and Carlie Cooper's Scientist Supreme, with Baron Mordo Sorceror Supreme.
Our hearts and minds are a very different matter.
I'll leave that there.
This is classic Dan Slott: after coming up with ridiculous and outrageous materials (scientist supreme by eternity/squirrel girl beat thanos), run with it and run it to the ground (scientist supreme beat god and marry robots/unbeatable squirrel girl), then ambiguous retcon (Loki after being trapped and helpless, claims he gives the title as master plan/thanos says his clone cannot be distinguished even by Uatu).
In the Avengers, Tony Stark became an expert in thermonuclear astrophysics overnight. Couldn't Bruce Banner do the same with learning how to build robots and stuff?
We should wait and see what Marvel dishes out first before making too big a deal out of a synopsis which is clearly using some clever word play in order to not to give too much away.
I've been told that computer science plays a big part for physicists and Banner couldn't have possibly helped build the machine that turned him into the Hulk if he didn't know anything about Engineering.
I agree with that. As it is, the movie Avengers roster is one of the most balanced teams around, maybe not in terms of diversity but in terms of power and each member having a distinct skill set which they contribute to the team. Even the addition of Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver and Vision adds another layer to the team and each of them still stand out amongst the team without much overlap with each other.
On Avengers: EMH, the main science bros are Tony and Pym so T'Challa and Banner's science backgrounds don't get as much focus on emphasis. In the movie universe it's the opposite; the absence of Pym meant that Banner's science background is further emphasized and thus creates a greater contrasts when he changes from a meek super scientists to a raging monster.
Last edited by John Venus; 01-02-2015 at 02:11 AM.
The CBR Community Guidelines & Rules | Report but also PM me directly