My answer would be similar to Don C's, don't really care. Wouldn't want a label if someone asked me if I believe in fairies or dragons and I said I don't (I don't), but given that more people believe in gods/souls/spirits/other realms/karma/etc. than believe in fairies or dragons these days (though in the long history of mankind, let alone the much longer history of the planet, belief in those things was commonplace not very long ago) I suppose we have to have a label.
Most religions/religious thinking I've come across in my life (and I haven't sought it out since I was a kid mind you) seems to be either wishful thinking (getting to see dead loved ones again, getting to live forever, good being rewarded and evil punished, etc.), a primitive attempt to explain things we once believed would never and could never be known, and/or systems to control the behavior of others (whether for the good of the population at large or the good of those in charge, or some combo of the two). It seems to have no basis in fact or logic and those arguing for it tend to try and use vague or nonsensical language to avoid rational discussion beyond "well why do you think we're here?" types of questions ("I don't know" apparently not being satisfactory).
I will say while I used to be hostile towards religion (and still am when someone tries to defend or deny some pretty ridiculous and horrible things that come with it if you really examine these ancient religious texts and take them seriously), I don't think religion itself makes people worse than they would be without it. I think for the most part people who are terrible and use their religion to justify it would be terrible in an atheist-dominated world. Just as those who volunteer to help the homeless or give blood because they say that's what their religion teaches them to do would be doing those things if they didn't have religion in their lives. Religion can color and shape your behavior, but I don't think it's the cause.