I've read enough good Hickman books to trust that this is going to be a lot of fun.
I've read enough good Hickman books to trust that this is going to be a lot of fun.
Regardless of Hickman's story, it's the way we are sold what comes next as a direct consequence of the story only when we know why some things will happen. It's the patronising way we are told this stuff that bothers me.
God forbid we see through them and figure out that some things happen from a purely business stand point. Whether it's profit or rights disputes etc.
cherry picking parts of universes and pasts of characters where some change and some don't is the same as crisis and flashpoint so if this isn't a reboot they weren't either
The difference is that in Flashpint some characters had histories that were VERY SIMILAR to what came before, (Batman, Green Lantern, mostly) but they weren't the SAME. There were some differences, often fairly big ones, once things began to be revealed. once you make it so that no superhero had appeared more than 5 years prior, no matter how superficially similar some aspects of a character may be, they can't possibly be the exact same version. That is not the case here. Every character participating can keep the entirety of their past 100% intact.
But there has been no mention at all of 'merging' characters. Just... Secret Wars, everyone fights (presumably, Battleworld and all) and then the victors are the characters in the main MU going forward. I somehow doubt that the majority of characters afterward won't be the 616 versions, it's just a way to fold in some of the more well liked alternate universe characters, like probably Miles Morales, but Peter Parker will most likely still be around as well.
Last edited by Raye; 01-20-2015 at 03:31 PM.
Its not necessarily a reboot in classic comic book terms but Marvel never makes anything "classic." They've been a flagship for experimentation and for many years continuity. As certain comic title sales have diminished, they tried to change characters to appeal to the masses with about a 50% success rate. To me, this is another experiment in comics which will slog down the entire industry with a lackluster story and enough sales to boost another event. It may not be a reboot, but its definitely a "HEY GUYS, HERE ARE SOME NEW NUMBER ONES, YOU LOVE NUMBER ONES" which usually smells a lot like a reboot so I understand why people are using the term.
If a reboot is when Marvel redoes character backstories and/or reworks characters, then Marvel has been doing it for years! Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are no longer children of Magneto, a Muslim Ms. Marvel, Daredevil is now decently happy, Hawkeye is the lazy Avenger, Scott Summers is now a jerk and Wolverine and Uatu are dead. (Not all of these "reboots" are bad, but you get the gist of what I am saying; Marvel Universe is like quicksand, its always changing.)
My big misgiving here is we already went through this with the Ultimate Universe...so I'm not sure how up I am to see everything started from scratch.
Spider is an issue IMO...we've seen at least 4 takes on his origin in a major way (Original, Ultimate, Raimi Film, Recent FIlm) and also Miles Morales...re hashing the origin and reboot seems played out with marvel's biggest commodity
Leaving my own feelings on this as a reader and critic aside, I feel for direct market small business owners with this. Marvel is putting them in a spot where they may have to make some incredibly risk ordering decisions at a time of year when those that are able are trying to solidify their business plans for the coming year. I mean, I wasn't and haven't been a fan of the New 52, but at least the conceit was there and it was made clear that the look and the titles would be the same. Support your LCS if you have one folks.
They are not getting rid of mutants!!! Uncanny and All-New sell too well. Despite all the paranoia, Marvel is a business and a businesses likes profit. I see two things that could happen:
1) They will streamline the X-Titles to 4-5 titles (including individual character titles) as opposed to 10+ titles. I'm OK with that. The franchise is currently in need of being streamlined.
2) They can incorporate the Ultimate version of the origin of mutant kind and thus sidestep some of the licensing woes with FOX. What characters can Fox use and what characters can Marvel Studios use, that sort of thing... I have just learned to accept movie synergy and move on.
Daredevil is getting a change of direction which will be more in line with the upcoming Netflix TV show. It is inevitable. I also predict the return of Karen Page post-Secret Wars.
Yeaaaaaah, about that, heh heh...
The original Ms. Marvel Carol Danvers is still around and kicking except now as Captain Marvel. That was not a reboot, this is a passing* on the mantle. Kamala Khan isn't Carol Danvers, nor will she ever be.
*More of a "taking the mantle without her permission, but you get the idea.