They don't seem to be doing anything heroic.
They don't seem to be doing anything heroic.
They are saving their Earth from destruction. To do that, they have to compromise their ethics. That doesn't mean they are not heroes, just not Superman/Captain America style heroes who have no sins.
Attempting to save the multiverse and their own earth from dying is pretty heroic to me.
The only difference is that these men are willing to do the unthinkable and cross the line.
Yeah you can debate on what it means to be a hero and how you shouldn't cross the line.
But in this case I think the ends really do justify the means.
For worlds to live, for life to go on sacrifices need be made.
The question seems to be the essential theme of the book, no? I'm reasonably sure that Hickman wants us to ask this type of question.
I think once they do "the unthinkable," they cease to be heroes at all. They become well-intentioned villains, i.e. High Evolutionary.
Perhaps. Or maybe in a setting where we are usually assured of exactly who is good and who is evil, Hickman is trying to tell a more nuanced story, where things like good and evil aren't so clear cut.
I actually find the fact that this is being written without the traditional perfect way out for the antagonists to be refreshing.
I don't think that things like good and evil are clear cut either, but I do think that killing billions is pretty clearly-cut evil.
I would say so, yeah.
Either all life is sacred, or none of it is. *shrug*