Both please. I prefer the versions that skillfully blends both.
I'd prefer the latter, usually Lex knowing Clark in Smallville just stretches credibility, imo.Silver Age and Smallville Lex who "knew" Clark from way back, or Lex who doesn't know who Kent is at all by the time Superman debuts?
I'm fine with either Lex origin depending on how they handle it. Sometimes Superman coming in out of nowhere and spoiling Lex's time in Metropolis is cool while their having a shared background in Smallville adds a lot of pathos.
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
I'm still not really sold on the animation style but I'm sure I'll get used to it. In some scenes or stills it just reminds me too much of Archer. XD
I think I can vaguely see the Archer comparison in terms of how crisp and idealized the designs are - Archer’s designs always came off like they were parodies of Neal Adams-esque art.
Now, the fact that DC cartoon is doing full blown animation, rather than using a computer program to move static digital figurines is a major difference that I think makes the comparison less skillful - the greater degree of poses and fluidity in the cartoon is on a different level than Archer.
Like action, adventure, rogues, and outlaws? Like anti-heroes, femme fatales, mysteries and thrillers?
I wrote a book with them. Outlaw’s Shadow: A Sherwood Noir. Robin Hood’s evil counterpart, Guy of Gisbourne, is the main character. Feel free to give it a look: https://read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asi...E2PKBNJFH76GQP
More villain appearances, hopefully that'll make people stop complaining about the Joker.
Ugh, is that what we're calling it?
Because they both have stupidly bold lines. I mean the animation works better here, but those lines, they're hard not to notice.
Some of us just don't like such thick lines.