I thought this was an interesting quote from an article posted on CBR:
As much as I'm enjoying the Tomorrowverse so far (which I guess isn't that difficult for me since I really, really, really disliked that last animated movie verse they did), the Elseworlds animated films were almost always better than the in-universe stuff, anyway, so this shouldn't be too difficult.So far, Gunn has not confirmed the fate of the Tomorrowverse, which is scheduled to release two new installments in 2023 -- Legion of Super-Heroes and Justice League: Warworld. However, DC Studios co-head Peter Safran has stated that the "bar is going to be very high for projects to be outside the DCU, the Elseworlds projects.
Keep in mind that you have about as much chance of changing my mind as I do of changing yours.
I think we're getting a pretty good balance between Tomorrowverse and Elseworld films and I don't think shifting things to being strictly more connected to the movies is a good idea in the long run. And who is to say that Gunn and Safran's bar for quality should be so absolute? They have their own tastes and biases and I have my own issues with Gunn as a creator.
Just watched Beware my Power the GL animated movie. Why do DC feel the need to continually destroy the character of Hal Jordan? Annoying.
Because as seen for the past 30 years, they obviously feel he's the only one who provides competition to whoever they decide to push as the new main GL, so in order to do that they need to make sure that competition is eliminated. Sounds cynical but that's all this is about. I didn't really believe it until I saw that movie but their actions speak for themselves.
That's why they had Green Arrow and Sinestro there, characters directly associated with Hal. They wanted to crap on him while making sure to transfer elements closely associated with him to John, though I'm sure if Kyle or anyone else was the main character they would've done the exact same thing. This movie's agenda was so amateurishly transparent. I'd expect more from people like Jim Crieg and Ernie Altbacker who worked on the GL: TAS yet here we are.
Last edited by Johnny; 02-04-2023 at 10:04 AM.
Keep in mind that you have about as much chance of changing my mind as I do of changing yours.
The Disney+ shows I've been hot and cold on. I enjoy some parts of them but there also is a bunch of stuff that holds them back, and nothing on the level of the best Marvel cartoons of the past have come out under Feige's reign so far.
Maybe the X-Men:TAS revival or Spider-Man Freshman Year will start to really change that, but I have my doubts.
I'm not really sure what holds them back. They're doing exactly what they're designed to do which is tie into the MCU in an entertaining fashion. *shurgs*
IDK, I'd say What If? is as good as either Spectacular Spider-Man or Earth's Mightiest, which I think are really the only standouts 30 or so years (for all the fan praise they seem to get, the '90s X-Men and Spider-Man cartoons do not age well).
Keep in mind that you have about as much chance of changing my mind as I do of changing yours.