So after challenging the notion of "possession", now you are challenging the notion of "mind-control"...
I mean, you can try and work whatever angle you feel the need to, at the end of the day the result will be the same: it wasn't on her.
The Life Force possessed her thanks to Doom.
Red Skull mind-controlled her thanks to Xavier's brain.
If she had to stand trial, she would be found innocent.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
Victor is just fine with that. I really don't like the fact that Heinberg used Doom to fix Bendis's sloppy writing but he's not going to go for trial for anything. The whole case is unprovable in court anyway. If I looked someone in the eye and said "Why don't you drop dead" and then they did drop dead, without me touching them, what crime could you charge me with? Now how about if we weren't even in the same room? Or the same city? The same state? The same planet?
I don't think so. There was actus reus (witnessed by all the xmen and avengers and strange and all of genosha) and mens rea (established by Emma, and objectively affirmed by her sharing that info with Scott at the moment). I don't think any court appointed psychologist would buy her insanity defense or "possession" defense. Kavita Rao needs to administer the Cure, and Danger needs to shove her in the brig.
"The means are as important as the end - we have to do this right or not at all.
Anything less negates every belief we've ever had, every sacrifice we've ever made."
"Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
"No justice, no peace."
Let's cool the "Wanda = Hitler" hyperbole, okay? Any further posts comparing fictional superheroes to Hitler will be deleted.