On the subject of the baby.... clearly there is something not right with it. It's got weird black smoke stuff coming out it's mouth, and then there was this solicit released last month, which kinda confirms that:
ANGELA: ASGARD’S ASSASSIN #5
KIERON GILLEN & MARGUERITE BENNETT (W)
PHIL JIMENEZ & STEPHANIE HANS (A)
Cover by STEPHANIE HANS
• Superheroic to-do lists are quite the thing. Today, Angela’s read “INVADE MY HOMELAND, WHILST PURSUED BY ASGARDIANS, CARRYING A DEMONIC CHILD WITH ONLY MY SARCASTIC SPACE FRIENDS FOR COMPANY.”
• What will Starlord do when he discovers that Belinda Carlisle has totally lied to him? BECAUSE HEVEN IS A PLACE FULL OF ANGELS OUT TO KILL HIM.
So... yeah. That probably is relevant. I am not sure how Angela would have known it was 'demonic' and maybe she doesn't. But the fact that there's clearly something not right about it will no doubt be relevant, and is likely the reason it never does end up on the throne in King Thor's future.
I do not think Odin will send her to rescue Loki simply because I think it's Odin that tosses him into Jotunheim in the first place. It's his punishment, and it's up to him to get through it. Also, I can not see her working with any of the Asgardians at this point for any reason. they are too mad at her over the kidnapping, and she hates them. The only one is possibly Loki somewhere down the line, he has been the nicest to her of all of them. (and this IS Kieron Gillen writing, and he is dealing with some JIM plot threads, so... it could make sense.) But we know he doesn't, because this takes place prior to Agent of Asgard 10 where (for the first few pages anyway) Thor and Loki are fine with each other, and if Loki had joined with Angela, they would not have been. Maybe afterwards, though.
I do think Angela has a good chance of coming out of Secret Wars unscathed though simply because unlike most characters she has NO alternate versions that could possibly replace her because she is so new to the MU. Then again, Marvel has shown recently that they are perfectly willing to create NEW alts for Secret Wars. still though, she has an excellent chance of coming through it unscathed.
I've said this in the Loki thread before, but if you pay very close attention to King Loki's dialogue, you will notice that he actually NEVER lies. ever. At least not directly, he does lie by omission a couple times, and there are times where he tells a technical truth, but a misleading one. So... I don't think he's technically lying about who he is, but I do not think he has given us the whole truth. But yeah, as i said above when talking about Sera, I do not think King Loki is strictly real, and he's just neglected to mention this bit. I think the real guy pulling the strings is Loki in the future, scribbling away in a book, and we just do not have enough to go on at the moment to say what his intentions may be.good point about those who watch.
in fact; i'm wondering if King Loki is in fact, any version of loki at all; and if his monologues have actually been a lie for our (and the watchers) benefit?