Mary Janes by a landslide. She's the best developed, and she's who I grew up with. Marriage or no, she's the undisputed queen of his heart.
Felicia is fun, but she's more of a sexy bad girl fantasy than a real partner. And I only ever liked Gwen in the Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon. In 616, all she ever did was cry about how crappy of a boyfriend Peter was (can't really blame her, though...)
MJ. The only time Gwen has come close is when writers have occasionally re-personality-ized her to be more like MJ, like in the ASM films. Everyone else are just meaningless also-rans.
MJ and Peter - hey those kids should get married some day!
Last edited by JBatmanFan05; 02-18-2015 at 02:48 PM.
Things I love: Batman, Superman, AEW, old films, Lovecraft
Grant Morrison: “Adults...struggle desperately with fiction, demanding constantly that it conform to the rules of everyday life. Adults foolishly demand to know how Superman can possibly fly, or how Batman can possibly run a multibillion-dollar business empire during the day and fight crime at night, when the answer is obvious even to the smallest child: because it's not real.”
I don't think it's fair to say whose Peter's best love interest when all of the previous ones never had the chance to develop. Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane had the longest time to develop their respective relationship with Peter. Felicia Hardy and Betty Brant, or single parents Liz Allan and Julia Carpenter never had that opportunity.
Of course MJ will get the biggest votes as opposed to the others because she's been in Peter's life for more than 20 years as a married couple. It would have been a fair assessment if the relationship between Peter and the others were flushed out in a manner where others writers would continue to use them. But we seen that opportunity happen. Even Carol and Jessica, Silver Sable and The Black Widow if the writers had considered using them in the same manner as the Black Cat.
Notable point. Listen, I'd think Peter should be married now IF he got married more early on in his comic history like Reed & Sue. I definitely think there are anti-marriage arguments that can be questioned and argued (including my deciding factors). No one easy answer.
I'm not that far from being an ardent pro-MJ-marriage fan, I never questioned the rightness or wrongness of it until OMD forced me to think about it all long and hard.
Last edited by JBatmanFan05; 02-18-2015 at 04:04 PM.
Things I love: Batman, Superman, AEW, old films, Lovecraft
Grant Morrison: “Adults...struggle desperately with fiction, demanding constantly that it conform to the rules of everyday life. Adults foolishly demand to know how Superman can possibly fly, or how Batman can possibly run a multibillion-dollar business empire during the day and fight crime at night, when the answer is obvious even to the smallest child: because it's not real.”
Those characters could fit into Peter's grounded life respectively if those relationships were written by a writer would could pull it off. It needn't be a constant superhero adventures together; rather in a normal civilian setting in a cameo appearance. The same could apply to Jennifer Walters human persona who could work very well with Peter Parker in a normal everyday type setting as we once saw with Mary Jane or Betty Brant. It all depends on how well the writer can established it in a manner that would interest the readers into supporting the story by buying into the series events.
MJ's developement from just a party girl into the wife and companion of Peter Parker was so great,so vivid,it was like watching a real world couple and their journey of their lives.I dare to say,it's probably the best comic book couple in the industry.They didn't start from day one,but they ended up together and they became so classic as Lois and Clark.
" I am Loki Scar-Lip, Loki Skywalker, Loki Giant's Child, Loki Lie-Smith. I am Loki, who is fire and wit and hate. I am Loki. And I will be under an obligation to no one."
Previously known as Nefarius