Wow, totally incorrect on every level. The comparison is completely relevant.
Being white is exactly who Peter Parker is. It has everything to do with his development as a character. Just because he doesn't run around screaming "White power" does not make him less caucasian. He may peripherally care about social issues, he isn't a bigot, but he can also unmask and walk into a store without the added scrutiny that comes with being black (Just as a crude example).
Spider-Man, ostensibly, could BE anybody UNDER the mask. But Peter is white. He is as white as white gets. In fact, has anyone African American ever even written Spider-Man in a meaningful, lasting and impactful way? WHITE. It is who he is.
Luke Cage does his thing without a mask. He is black. He has and lives the concerns of a black man because those are relevant to who is is, why he is and how he behaves. It affects his motivations. The fact that Peter Parker is NOT black is exactly why this is a perfect comparison. You are talking about adding these cultural concerns to who Peter Parker is, therefore completely changing the character as he is as both Peter Parker AND Spider-Man.
So I say it again, a white person would not play Luke Cage, why then would we want a black person to play Peter Parker? Why not allow for the creation of a character, or better yet, Miles Morales carry the cultural mores that come with his ethinicity rather than rewrite the DNA of an established character?
Anything else is an alteration of the established character... and at that point, creativity suggests making a new character, rather than trying to whitewash the old one.
Last edited by Fiasco Jones; 02-22-2015 at 02:38 PM.
I voted - No, race should not be a factor either way in a decision to cast a new Peter Parker, it is just the way I feel. If the actor is good and fits the role go with him.
i think you could make some sort of argument for peter’s ethnicity having an effect on his development in the comic books, i don’t know if it is intrinsic enough so as to affect the nucleus of the character. would an asian american wise-cracking nerd called peter who lived with his extended family be that different? don’t think so.
my feeling is that if an actor of a non-caucasian background captured the essence of peter’s persona more accurately and joyously than a rival caucasian actor, why not cast him? that being said though, I also have no issue with his default casting being caucasian.
Since he'd be Asian and living in Queens, I think there'd be some meat to add to that version of Peter. There's a fairly healthy Asian community in the area that's been growing for a lot of years now, and a few Asian gangs as well.
It probably wouldn't follow exactly with the stories folks read in comics, but that's sorta the point.
yeah, could go either way depending on how the writer wants to portray the character and what they want to say. it would be valid (and interesting) to address the realities of being an asian american in queens but it’s also every bit as valid to portray him as a “fully integrated” asian american with little difference from a caucasian. but neither would change the heart of who peter is. you can even keep the full name in both cases, which could create a few funny circumstances.
No sorry not incorrect, but thanks for the opinion.
My point is the MOVIES are not the comic books therefor do not impact the comics or the history of said comic book!
Peter Parker does not fight crime or injustices that have occurred to his race, Luke Cage has. That is a major difference. Not sure how you don't see that.
Skin color is just skin color. Doesn't matter to me if they use a non-white person in the role.