Just a reminder to everyone to keep things nice and civil. Please don't lower yourselves to the level of personal insults or remarks.
"Let me guess. My theories appall you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters, and you don't like my tie!"@Matt_of_Geek
Now writing at The Atomic Junk Shop
CBR Community Standards and Rules
I have personally been defending the cover, but I also espouse the fact that everyone is entitled to express an opinion. I just don't understand why when certain people disagree they feel the need to issue death threats and/or demeaning sexual insults. It's terrible, terrible, terrible. Disgusted right now!
I didn't say it does. This thread opens up with the notion that the cover was removed because of threats, and hence people are crying about censorship, coercion, etc. in a way to belittle and undermine the entire base of people who were against the cover. Now they need a new leg to stand on.
So people from yesterday time traveled to the 80s so that they could interpret the Killing Joke scene as rape? Totally makes sense.
Last edited by Kid A; 03-16-2015 at 07:54 PM.
Yeah, wherever the threats came from, it's pathetic. No matter what. I'll gladly take back my jumped conclusion that the artist himself was threatened, as I don't know that and probably never will. But there's no justification for that whatever the side the one who is making the threats is on. You're still garbage if you do that.
That said its not a contradiction to at the same time be of the opinion that outright canceling the cover is the wrong move. I still believe that. Because there's idiots out there who share that opinion but can't express it in a manner greater than that of an ape doesn't mean I should feel the need to be ashamed of or abandon that opinion.
It really doesn't. If anything, you'd think DC would cave to the threats of the people threatening the people complaining. Giving the complaining party what they want makes those threats, theoretically, more real. Which is all dumb as hell. The threats should just be ignored, just like the complaints of a few people.
With the Spider-Woman Variant, I can understand why people were offended. But this? Because it 'goes against the tone of the book?' Of course it goes against the current tone of the book-its a flashback to an earlier story, and a famous Joker story in a series of covers about the Joker. Batgirl's history hasn't always been about rainbows and happiness. Of course the cover image is terrifying, but the average episode of The Walking Dead is scarier than this. Is it because a woman is being threatened? In Death of the Family, Damian (a 10 year old) had to confront the faceless Joker, which I'd say is far more inappropriate than this. Plus, the Joker has threatened various other female characters with no controversy. I'm not sure that I get what the fuss is about. I know that it's creepy and dark, but we've seen far more gory Joker moments than this with no controversy.