Page 12 of 21 FirstFirst ... 28910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 306
  1. #166
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toysoldier View Post
    I have no problem with this argument in general. I think it is fine to show people that our society is full of different types of people.

    However, this is not what we are seeing in the books. We are not getting a diverse set of characters. We are getting a specific type of representation of certain groups. Any character from "oppressed" groups must be presented in the most positive way with no character flaws. The Wonder Woman creative team spurred negative reactions from the politically minded when they kept the Amazons true to their mythological nature and had them rape and murder men to populate their island. That character flaw made those characters interesting, but the collective response from the politically minded was that Amazons could not be so cruel or imperfect.

    So while I would agree that we should have only white men be heroes and only non-white people be villains, we also should not create a situation in which only white men can be villains and any other group can never have any negative trait at all.
    I was one of those people who objected and it wasn't because I was politically minded but because I had grown up seeing the Amazon's portrayed as an enlightened, advanced civilization and they continued that way through the Perez era. Then amazon's attack reduced them to an advanced bloodthirsty group that would cut the heads of men and Azzarello portrayed them as a bronze age culture that regularly raped and murdered men and traded male babies or just killed them (it was hard to tell), I thought that the amazon's I grew up with were just as interesting. It wasn't political on my part. I also didn't like the idea that Zeus was Diana's father.

  2. #167
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarlet Frost View Post
    12 Years A Slave was better received than Selma because it still have the white man giving governance of of the black man's freedom. Selma wasn't a well received by certain groups because they didn't see enough white people telling the blacks it was okay. A new kind of "Magic Negro" but for white people.
    LBJ is a liberal holy cow.

  3. #168
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Brady View Post
    If they were significant, they wouldn't be in the minority.

    significant parts of the minority groups. Just being in a minority does not make you a noble being.

  4. #169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arundel Armor Hunter View Post
    The only reason they would mention it is shock value and clicks, minus the KKK of course. I doubt they care, why would they?
    Sacrlet rost:

    Teh only that allows and does not allow the Panther is the market.
    Dude, seriously. You're not saying anything.

  5. #170
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Brady View Post
    Please rethink the logic of that question.



    There's probably a word or two missing here.
    The only thing that allows or does not allow the Panther to succeed is the market.
    Please rethink the logic of that question.

    Please rethink why perfection should be a goal.

  6. #171
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark View Post
    I was one of those people who objected and it wasn't because I was politically minded but because I had grown up seeing the Amazon's portrayed as an enlightened, advanced civilization and they continued that way through the Perez era. Then amazon's attack reduced them to an advanced bloodthirsty group that would cut the heads of men and Azzarello portrayed them as a bronze age culture that regularly raped and murdered men and traded male babies or just killed them (it was hard to tell), I thought that the amazon's I grew up with were just as interesting. It wasn't political on my part.
    Everything is political, whether or not you want it to be, whether or not you're concious of it.

  7. #172
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,068

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toysoldier View Post
    I do not think supporting someone means you ought to accept vitriol and abuse. I also do not think that having a valid complaint means you get a pass on being abusive. If a group spends a great deal of time attacking its supporters, I do not see why those supporters should stick around. The group makes it clear that what is wanted is not their support, just the appearance of it.
    A supporter is not gonna get "vitriol and abuse."

    But if you're mansplaining, and whitesplaining, and straightsplaining and confuse that with support... chile, you better duck and cover.

    And if you're using other people's struggle as a stage for yourself to stroke your own ego no matter whether you actually help or harm the course, you better be prepared to get the hook.

  8. #173
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Brady View Post
    Everything is political, whether or not you want it to be, whether or not you're concious of it.
    No, I disagree. I can dislike a story direction without being political. I didn't like the Great Gatsby and there was nothing political about my dislike of the book.

  9. #174
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arundel Armor Hunter View Post
    Please rethink why perfection should be a goal.
    Are you serious?

    Because that's how things get better for everyone.

  10. #175
    CBR's Good Fairy Kieran_Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,499

    Default

    The message of being a hero BY BEING AN ALLY has certainly been lost on many here...

  11. #176
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by the4thpip View Post
    A supporter is not gonna get "vitriol and abuse."

    But if you're mansplaining, and whitesplaining, and straightsplaining and confuse that with support... chile, you better duck and cover.
    So swallow the whole package right away, no alliance on just certain issues?

  12. #177
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark View Post
    No, I disagree. I can dislike a story direction without being political. I didn't like the Great Gatsby and there was nothing political about my dislike of the book.
    That just proves my point.

  13. #178
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Brady View Post
    Are you serious?

    Because that's how things get better for everyone.
    Chasing perfection was how things got worse for everyone in dictatorships. No other states declare perfect social harmony as a goal.

  14. #179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arundel Armor Hunter View Post
    The only thing that allows or does not allow the Panther to succeed is the market.
    Please rethink the logic of that question.

    Please rethink why perfection should be a goal.
    Which market is it that you speak? There are plenty of markets that come into play regarding the Black Panther movie.

    Also, perfection isn't a goal, it's a journey.

  15. #180
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,068

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toysoldier View Post
    I have no problem with this argument in general. I think it is fine to show people that our society is full of different types of people.

    However, this is not what we are seeing in the books. We are not getting a diverse set of characters. We are getting a specific type of representation of certain groups. Any character from "oppressed" groups must be presented in the most positive way with no character flaws. (...)
    Have you read Loki, Agent of Asgard?
    He's arguably Marvel's most high-profile queer character, and they don't come more tarnished than the God of Lies.
    Phyla-Vell somehow managed to be both arrogant and insecure. Her girlfriend Moondragon is borderline psychotic.
    Destiny and Mystique are terrorists with blood on their hands.

    Northstar, their first gay hero, was created as an insufferable jerk. He's softened a bit, but he is still an arrogant ass.

    The "heroes" in Milestone's Blood Syndicate were all minorities, and they included a crack addict and a teenage parent.

    Over at DC, Scandal Savage is both a lesbian and a killer. So is her girlfriend, Knockout. Renée Montoya is an alcoholic.

    What books do you read to get the impression that all minority characters are perfect little gems?
    Last edited by the4thpip; 03-21-2015 at 11:31 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •