Last edited by magpieM; 10-13-2017 at 02:35 PM.
That both him and Mia were homeless kids who done things they weren't proud of. Jason used to steal and it something he wasn't happy about and Mia sold her body. Nowhere it was hinted whatever you thought of.
And I don't care about what Daniel intended or didn't. His story was pretty terrible and has nothing to do with Winnick or anyone else for that matter.
The only thing I can remember was when Winnick was asked if Jason was bisexual
https://comicvine.gamespot.com/podca...01-11/1600-92/SL: Is he (Jason) a little bisexual?
JW: That was the first time we’ve ever saw him mess around with anybody. Truth is, I haven’t really thought about it. I think about Jason in a lot of other ways. You might put him in bed, I don’t do that. That was the only time I thought about him having sex because she wanted to.
SL: Oh, I put him in bed! No, really —
JW: I’m totally dodging the question. This is me ducking the question. There’s things we can talk about and there’s things we can’t talk about, there’s things that DC Comics doesn’t like me talking about and they don’t like us talking about things like that, so I don’t want to answer that, thank you.
Even if it wasn't the intent, it's how it came across. Of course both those stories were terrible, but people didn't pick up the idea from nowhere.
Still, is quite different if what Devin Grayson did (or Seely for that matter).
I don't know what the point you trying to make by quoting that interview Dark since I know about it. It has nothing to do with anything except Winnick didn't want to get himself in any unnecessary troubles because we live in a world where confirming a some random character is straight that means you are bigot which I unfortunately has seen people harassing others over this in social media. Unless he flat out admitted that he did intend to do that like Devin admitted that Dick was supposedly bi, you can't really use this as a proof.
And to Alycat, it didn't come across like that to me and many others.
Last edited by Rise; 10-13-2017 at 02:42 PM.
I didn't say it was some definite thing. Just a combination of factors that made it seem like that from the writing. Nothing like now, where Lobdell has clearly debunked these things.
It blows my mind that people don't understand dark, edgy guy humor when it comes to Jason.
Has anyone here seen the t.v. show shameless the character of Frank Gallagher from there is how I've always imagined willis todd to be like has anyone else ever thought that.
Where are people getting this idea there was any kind of sexual innuendo between Jason and Bruce in Pre Flashpoint stories set after UTRH? Bruce`s message in BOTC (written by Tony Daniel) was supposed to echo Jason`s earlier words to Mia in Green Arrow by Winnick. That he, like her, most likely did more than steal to survive in the streets. The implication Daniel flew with was that Jason had also been in the prostitution market.
Any merit such a concept could have in theory would require a great writer to juggle with finesse, which was hardly the case. It painted Jason a broken character who never had the chance because was damaned from the get go, painted Dick and Tim utter assholes because they saw the message and still acted like they had no idea why someone would flip over like that given the context and most of all paints Bruce as a severily inept sadistic trolling of a father, nevermind a human being.
That being said, in the old days Batman and Robin did have some innuendo, on purpose or otherwise (I say this because truly it`s hard to believe how some panels weren`t supposed to get a reaction out of readers) which led to perceptions like the ever popular sexual infatuation of the dinamic duo in popular culture.
And to end the night in cool trivia, here`s Pre Crisis Jason with his original costume
https://bobbenkatzen.deviantart.com/