Page 2 of 27 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 402
  1. #16
    Mighty Member oldschool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,667

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael P View Post
    I can't really recall much "waiting by the window". Maybe it all happened in Web, which I didn't read much of. DeMatteis and Michelinie, as I recall, tended to have MJ channel the frustration and worry into something.

    It was there but probably just not as much of it as some seem to recall in hindsight.

  2. #17
    Mighty Member Aruran.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,432

    Default

    It happened in Spectacular for a bit, really it went into high gear post-clone saga.

  3. #18
    Were You There? Michael P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Location, Location!
    Posts
    2,963

    Default

    See, I remember post-Clone Spectacular as the book where MJ beat the Chameleon with a baseball bat so hard he had brain damage.

    Which just goes to show, people remember what they want to remember, and fill in the rest.
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's whether I win or lose." - Peter David, on life

    "If you can't say anything nice about someone, sit right here by me." - Alice Roosevelt Longworth, on manners

    "You're much stronger than you think you are." - Superman, on humankind


    All-New, All-Different Marvel Checklist

  4. #19
    Really Feeling It! Kevinroc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    13,351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael P View Post
    See, I remember post-Clone Spectacular as the book where MJ beat the Chameleon with a baseball bat so hard he had brain damage.

    Which just goes to show, people remember what they want to remember, and fill in the rest.
    That's the story where I started reading Spider-Man comics. So good.

  5. #20
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael P View Post
    MJ hasn't been the "one-dimensional party girl" since Gwen died.
    Agree 100%

  6. #21
    Incredible Member RedQueen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    773

    Default

    MJ couldn't stay the "party girl" just as much as peter could still be selling photographs of himself to the Bugle. Look, he can apply that logic to Peter, but not Mary Jane, hm?

    Slott seems to like old time Spidey but problem is old school Spidey was very much a product of it's age. Not that it's really a bad thing it's just Peter will be forever be stuck with his Parker luck.

    I think he only looks at MJ from love interest standpoint. The writing of her the last few years heavily indicates so. i quite like MJ and Peter's relationship but I think you can't look at such a well established character such as MJ just from that point of view. Also considering her fanbase, which from personal experience I have found is quite large and very intense and passionate, you're gonna have treat the character better because there are people who want to see MJ on a monthly basis. Or like run.

  7. #22
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldschool View Post
    Count me among those that feel MJ's backstory was painfully retrofitted to make her marriage material for Pete but it really wasn't done overnight.
    An awful lot of work had to be done to make MJ fit to be a viable Mrs. Peter Parker and I believe that all that effort a) showed that MJ wasn't a great fit for Peter, marriage-wise, in the first place, she was just shoehorned into the role and b) all the character alterations diluted what had made MJ a vibrant and interesting member of the supporting cast for years.

  8. #23
    Were You There? Michael P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Location, Location!
    Posts
    2,963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RedQueen View Post
    I think he only looks at MJ from love interest standpoint.
    I don't know if Slott does that, but there are definitely creators who do, and it shows in their work. And to make the marriage work, you definitely need to break out of that mold of thinking. The writers who couldn't, well, that's where the klunkers in that period come from.
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's whether I win or lose." - Peter David, on life

    "If you can't say anything nice about someone, sit right here by me." - Alice Roosevelt Longworth, on manners

    "You're much stronger than you think you are." - Superman, on humankind


    All-New, All-Different Marvel Checklist

  9. #24
    Were You There? Michael P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Location, Location!
    Posts
    2,963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Warren View Post
    An awful lot of work had to be done to make MJ fit to be a viable Mrs. Peter Parker and I believe that all that effort a) showed that MJ wasn't a great fit for Peter, marriage-wise, in the first place, she was just shoehorned into the role and b) all the character alterations diluted what had made MJ a vibrant and interesting member of the supporting cast for years.
    I think part of the problem is thinking of it as "Mrs. Peter Parker", as opposed to "Mary Jane, who is married to Peter Parker". But she wouldn't be the first female character creators have made that mistake with.
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's whether I win or lose." - Peter David, on life

    "If you can't say anything nice about someone, sit right here by me." - Alice Roosevelt Longworth, on manners

    "You're much stronger than you think you are." - Superman, on humankind


    All-New, All-Different Marvel Checklist

  10. #25
    Fantastic Member Yvonmukluk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    463

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Warren View Post
    An awful lot of work had to be done to make MJ fit to be a viable Mrs. Peter Parker and I believe that all that effort a) showed that MJ wasn't a great fit for Peter, marriage-wise, in the first place, she was just shoehorned into the role and b) all the character alterations diluted what had made MJ a vibrant and interesting member of the supporting cast for years.
    There's a phrase for what you're describing.

    It's called 'character development'.

  11. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RedQueen View Post
    MJ couldn't stay the "party girl" just as much as peter could still be selling photographs of himself to the Bugle. Look, he can apply that logic to Peter, but not Mary Jane, hm?

    Slott seems to like old time Spidey but problem is old school Spidey was very much a product of it's age. Not that it's really a bad thing it's just Peter will be forever be stuck with his Parker luck.
    Has he wrote MJ to be a 'party girl?' Last I looked she was owned her own business and had her **** together.

  12. #27
    Ultimate Member Mister Mets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    19,043

    Default

    I've gotta say that I liked the Lee/ Romita Mary Jane. She's a fun character.
    Sincerely,
    Thomas Mets

  13. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yvonmukluk View Post
    There's a phrase for what you're describing.

    It's called 'character development'.
    What happened with MJ wasn't character development. They altered her past to explain she only used the party girl personality as an act to hide who she really was. It came from no where, wasn't planned by any writer and was done purely to accommodate the decision to have her and Peter marry, a decision made for sales. They needed someone who could believably marry Peter but didn't have one, so they altered someone to fit that mold. They even made it so that MJ always knew he was Spider-Man, making her the least likeable character anytime she complained Peter was late since she knew why he was late.

  14. #29
    Astonishing Member Tuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    3,873

    Default

    Honestly, I never found Mary Jane terribly interesting before JMS. She felt as much like a stock character as most of Peter's supporting cast from the early days.

    Ultimate Spider-Man was the first time I actively started liking the character.

  15. #30
    Astonishing Member Vortex85's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,533

    Default

    É
    Quote Originally Posted by Amazing Michael Deery View Post
    Has he wrote MJ to be a 'party girl?' Last I looked she was owned her own business and had her **** together.
    I like Dan's MJ but I don't agree that she lost anything from the marriage. Was every plot perfect? Was it always as compellig as it could have been? no, not all the time. But at the end MJ came out a much more rich and storied character with plenty of memorable moments that firmly cement her into the hearts of fans. Even Dan incorporates the added layers of her personality that came about during the marriage era, incorporating MJ as Peter's closest confidant and friend.

    In the end, the marriage was a big win for the character and while I like Dan's portrayal, I find her current status dimishes the worth of her character, to the point where the once #1 reigning Spider-female is now to new fans like "MJ who?"
    Last edited by Vortex85; 04-02-2015 at 03:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •