One female writer, Juliet Kahn (in a review, at
http://comicsalliance.com/wonder-wom...ello-chiang-dc that I think most of us praised when it came out just after the run ended) conceded that Azz's run was "kinda" feminist. Not exactly a ringing endorsement, but she at least agrees that there is a feminist side of the run. Like
dumbduck, Kahn sees Wonder Woman's devotion to protecting Zola as a strong feminist element in the story, and she sees Wonder Woman herself as exemplifying feminist values in general. And she also appreciates the lack of cheesecake. She complains, however, that "while the run may embrace 'values of women’s culture,' it does not embrace women." I can respect that point of view, but several of the female characters (especially Zola) seem more interesting and sympathetic to me than they apparently do to her, and the sins of the Amazons strike me as more obviously reactions to misogyny, and the bad behavior of a character like Orion seems more clearly disapproved by the text to me than it does to her. So I go stronger than "kinda" feminist, but both interpretations seem supportable.
Another female reviewer for Comics Alliance, Janelle Asselin, says this about teh Azz/Chiang run:
Asselin finds the Zeus paternity "problematic," but evidently not enough to prevent her from praising the run in an article about the need for Wonder Woman books to be feminist (written as a response to David Finch's controversial "I don't want to say feminist" comment.) ...