That comics alliance article is perfect.
That comics alliance article is perfect.
The best part of all of this, is that I re-read X-Men #1 from 1963 a few days ago, and Bobby was the only one NOT hitting on Jean as soon as she entered the school. And don't get me started on the homoerotic overtones between Bobby and Hank in the original 60s comics.
This is one of the most beautiful things I've ever read! Thank you!
Very validating to bi/pan/poly, and really any such relationship configuration and romantic human path one can walk.
I get how everyone has decided they're from different realities already.
As far as the comic has shown, they're both from the 616 so they're the same Bobby so if younger Bobby is gay then older Bobby should be as well.
They're friends, so it's relevant. But yes, she shouldn't have forced it; as Kalen says she should have dropped hints. Maybe in five months and he still hasn't pegged onto it she can be more direct.
I would love this, although Iceman was introduced as a teenager and a main character (unlike Jubilee who was teenage and a background character, and Angel who was presented as an adult) so not sure if that would work. Maybe we can even give him an on-screen boyfriend? It would be great to finally have a gay superhero on screen (besides the Pied Piper as a villain in the Flash and the odd cartoon with Northstar.)
Yep, Jean isn't everybody's type and not everyone wants to creepily male gaze on a friendly girl you've just met. Plus he could be equally asexual.
I'm pretty sure the first attempts to define sexuality as terms were made in the 1800s, but I don't believe bisexuality was a part of that. It certainly was at least a known thing when Kinsey was doing his research during the 1950s, although it might not have been necessarily called bisexual, just a number on the scale. However 'gay' is used far more commonly as a term than bisexual, especially during the 60s when less was known about sexual identity than is known today.
No. Just no. That would be "never read a Bendis book again" level of offensive, especially given there are people who have undergone conversion therapy and either been severely psychologically damaged or died.
Whilst it's true sexuality is not necessarily tied to who you have or had sex with, sexual identity is a lot more than just "HEY I SLEPT WITH A CHICK I'M PROBABLY STRAIGHT OR BI." Although it would be an interesting narrative point to explore if Bobby maybe does have sex to prove his sexuality, but if it makes him realise he's straight that would be the wrong approach. For him to realise he's bi could be interesting though if executed well. But my mum made the same stupid argument "well how do you know when you've never been with a girl?" Well sometimes you just know.
Yeah, a lot of flashbacks and origin retellings have opted for the contemporary setting - see Slott's Learning to Crawl and Brubaker's Captain America, for example. However Bendis seems to approach it differently, from the perspective of a compressed timeline. Which would really mean Christmas happens like three times a year. So in Mighty Avengers, Bendis had a two issue flashback to the 1970s comic era featuring Sentry, and it looked exactly like a 1970s comic book, with 1970s cultural references intact. My theory is that for the characters living back then it was the 60s, but when a character remembers those events from the present or time travels back there, it's framed relative to the character's contemporary present. But y'know, suspension of disbelief and all that.
I agree with this, although Iron Man and Batman are more high profile so a sexuality retcon would never happen. Plus they're both playboy billionaire types and very much the womaniser, which Bobby hasn't really been presented as. But I agree, just because he hasn't had a strong relationship doesn't mean he isn't attracted to girls. Relationships are hard.
If it advances the character arc, it's relevant.
There are plenty of things retcons and events can reverse. But sexual orientation is not one of them. It would be insulting to be "nah, he's gay!" and suddenly turn around and be like "it's a different universe! He's straight!"
In theory it has nothing to do with it, but I have had conversations where I've said similar stuff to that. So Bendis is just trying to add some naturalistic conversation (although not perfectly.)
Last edited by Conn Seanery; 04-22-2015 at 01:12 AM.
Films blog / Books blog / Comics blog / Tumblr / Twitter / Flickr / Photobucket / Dailymotion / YouTube
My BFI Film Academy short film Hold-Out
Review column on Doctor Who fansite kasterborous.com
CBR's LGBT Community
Yes that was pretty dead on for me.
I also enjoyed this article as well: http://bisexual-books.tumblr.com/pos...ries-in-comics
That. It feels more like Bendis being desperate for attention after his X-Men run went nowhere than a well thought character development.
I remember reading that Marvel was "breaking its toys" - as in, making big changes (black Captain America, dead Wolverine, dead Deadpool, Thor unworthy, Iron Man evil, etc), knowing they would undo nearly everything after Secret Wars. This feels like one of those changes for the sake of making Bendis' run actually relevant for a few months.
Well in reading in more on this Bendis seems to hint at a follow up .So i well reserve comment till then but Bendis comments seem to hint at them dicussing adult Iceman being in closet so at least either way it will have conclusion so i am happy for that.
I'm more surprised that Iceman didn't turn out to be transgender. I'm still waiting for some creative team to make a popular hero turn out to be transgender. I'm going to go with Wolverine.
Well, if that happens, then specially this one is gonna create pretty fireworks.
And i dont know, but Teen Iceman has been pretty asexual; Tyke and Teen Angel has showed interest is a couple of girls and Teen Beast is really grateful of the existance of the yoga pants............................................. ..............................