You say 'true horror' but is Call of Cthulhu actually free of normal horror tropes? I don't really know anything about it, but scanning the synopsis of CoC I see mention of a cult, voodoo, rituals, piracy, lots of death, etc. It certainly sounds like he is using horror tropes to create a sense of tension, threat or unease. I know the point of Lovecraft's stories is that the most horrifying thing is the unknown, and the idea is that we are seeing but the merest fringes of some unknowable horror, but what I am saying is, as far as I can tell, that only works because the stories are told within a framework of a more traditional horror story - the 'true horror' as you call it is presented as being even worse than the conventionally disturbing and scary elements of the story. Genre is all about the context in which the idea of an indifferent, unbeatable universe is presented rather than the idea itself. If Cthulhu appeared in, say, the next issue of Ms. Marvel, it wouldn't be horror because the tone of Ms. Marvel is upbeat and chipper. You can't just have the scary idea on its own, without building up a horror framework to put it in. And that's what Avengers is, it is ideas plucked from cosmic horror but placed within a story that isn't scary in the slightest. It's not even eerie.
But like I said cosmic horror without the horror is basically just existential ideas, only literalised through science fiction.
Last edited by shgs; 04-29-2015 at 04:04 PM.
No it all their fault because with that information they could have just fought the Ivory Kings themselves rather than struggle trying to find hope in the hopeless. Everyone could have united against their foe rather than fight aimlessly. They still would have lost but still better than what came thus far.
Cosmic Horror is about that. It is about despair. You're right that if Cthullu showed in Ms. Marvel it wouldn't be horror because it is about hopelessness. The horror is found in the trappings you mention but in the fact that you are literally meaningless and that your time is coming up. Having conventional horror tropes helps but it really about existential horror. If Ms. Marvel had cthullu show up and she fell to her knees and realize it was hopeless and everything was doomed and her life was a joke then that is cosmic horror. Here you have the Beyonders as unstoppable gods destroying everything, the unknowable Black Priests, the heroes are becoming monsters trying to stop it, the world is falling apart and the truth is that they are going to lose. The enemies were too much for them, all their desires to be good was pointless, bodies are piling up and soon it's going to be their bodies and the worst part is they don't even know why. It like staring at an incoming tide wave and realizing there is nothing you can do to stop it or listening to someone crying out for help. Cosmic Horror is about making you despair.
Why does the Dr. Doom plot feel added on? Doom played a central part of Hickmans FF work. Then he appears rather quickly in NA. Yeah his story line kinda hung there while they did Infinity and the Great Society stuff but he has been front and center in TRO. You say you doubt any hanging plot pieces will be addressed in secret wars but Hickman has been slowly paying these things off. That manifold thing had been hanging since the first issue. The origin sites have been addressed that's where pod came from and where got his replication ability. I thought all the stuff with Bobbys Avengers was being handled in Avengers World but I haven't read it. WTS Hickman has still tried to tie everything together. Seeing Captain Universe again was great and I'm certain she will appear in Secret Wars. The only parts I haven't seen addressed we're the OS tie ins with the time gem. I'm even half expecting to see the superman guy from the Great society to show up again. I know not everyone liked it. There have been long threads about how it wasn't everyonea cup of tea etc, but there are people that have really enjoyed it.
Rogers was written like he was inverted. Petty, prideful,vengeful etc. The end of EVERYTHING is on the line and he's only looking for payback! How can Stark be blamed for "knowing" what would happen? He may not have had faith in all the plans, but what if the Illuminati or Sunspot or something else would have worked? Stark is always said to be a futurist but he has been wrong many times in the past. Even when extremis enhanced, he didnt see the skrull invasion or the rise of Osborn or many other things. I didnt like how everyone (including Reed) deferred to Rogers even though he was being so small minded.
So what were the Illuminati doing then? They all knew the same thing Tony knew, right, so this is all on them as well? And how much did Tony know anyway? He knew stopping Incursions was going to delay the end of the world, until it didn't. He didn't know that when he invented the Avengers Wheel. Tony did not invent the Avengers wheel knowing they would spin their wheels. He thought he would save the Multiverse.
It's good emotion you're showing there. It's the sort of response this sort of sudden ending of everything should elicit. It is horrible, and the only response is that life is pointless.
But then there is Battleworld. Life isn't all pointless, because some mirror reflections of what happened in the Multiverse isn't going away. Sure, seeing two planets crash into each other is going to be traumatic to all the people living on them, because their stories will end, or so they think. The White Heat of destruction will fry each and everyone and ...........
It is worth reflecting what the post-Silver Age has meant and what the characters look like when put under pressure. No, they aren't purely heroic. Tony shows his colours when his mortality approaches. Does Steve Rogers show his colours, as the son of a wife beater, who wanted to be the opposite of his father? We could look at all the characters approaching their mortality and wonder is this how we see the final story of all of them? Was the story of the 616 that final battle between Tony Stark and Steve Rogers? Do they represent something primeval, struggling eternally? In a Star Wars allegory, was this Anakin Skywalker and Obewan Kinobi?
Tony saw the dead Living Tribunal only at New Avengers #8Inf, so that was way down the road from Avengers Wheel, and was that the time Uatu also decided the Multiverse was ended and they both realized they had to put on a brave face till the end, and not let on anything or it would set off a panic? (Uatu couldn't keep it up and let Fury kill him - so Fury, the Unseen just blows up after the last Incursion?).
There was lots of stabbing on Incursion worlds, with bodies piled high. That's horror enough. Seeing a Planet approaching in the sky, is horror enough. Making Bombs to blow up planets, and using them, is horror enough.
What the 77 books relayed was, what do Heroes do when faced with these horrible choices and what does it do to them? You had to witness the disintegration of ethics that these characters lived by to appreciate the effect this horror movie was having on them and their world. This period of the Incursions wasn't your typical super hero story anymore.
What I couldn't understand was what Steve Rogers internalised about the Incursions. Now that he knows the Incursions lead to destruction, he is content to blame Tony Stark. What for? Because he loves Tony and Tony disappointed him by not letting him in on the secret? That's it? Rage?
Last edited by jackolover; 04-29-2015 at 07:07 PM.