I'd go with Shakespeare, arguably the greatest creative mind in world history.
However, Isambard Kingdom Brunel is a very impressive individual who I know little about.
ALAN TURING
ALFRED the Great
ARTHUR WELLESLEY, 1st Duke of Wellington
CHARLES DARWIN
Sir CHARLIE CHAPLIN
EDWARD JENNER
ELIZABETH I
EMMELINE PANKHURST
HENRY II
HORATIO NELSON, 1st Viscount Nelson
Sir ISAAC NEWTON
ISAMBARD KINGDOM BRUNEL
Captain JAMES COOK
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
Sir WINSTON CHURCHILL
I'd go with Shakespeare, arguably the greatest creative mind in world history.
However, Isambard Kingdom Brunel is a very impressive individual who I know little about.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
There's been a reevaulation of Richard the third.
Josephine Tey's book The Daughter of Time lays out an alternate view of history. And that was a bestseller.
He did have some nice accomplishments. He made it possible for people who can't afford legal representation to have their grievances heard VIA the couty of requests, banned restrictions on printing/ selling books, improved bail, had the laws translated from French to English, and made the Council of the North part of the legal machinery until 1641.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
I voted for Alan Turing. I think all of them are amazing, but I felt he needed a vote (and always good to support one of the greatest LGBT people ever born). There are few people that we can point to and say "without this individual, we would have never won the war"; Turing is one, Churchill is another.
I'm from Bristol; we're all schooled on his epicness from early on. Spent a lot of my childhood being driven over his Suspension Bridge.
Never get your history from Shakespeare Richard III was actually a very good king, he was a major contributor to the Council of the North. He did a lot of good; and a lot of laws that we still have today he in-acted/founded the original context. Sadly he was beaten by Henry Tudor, (i.e. Elizabeth I's ancestor); so obviously Shakespeare was going to make him the hero, and Richard the "villain".
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
I voted for Churchill..
Goldenballs is my favourite living Brit though
What we used to call life has very little worth these days. Welcome to the very edge.
--Prince Namor (Earth-616)
She's not even a martyr. She's just someone who married someone famous, had an affair (which I don't blame her for, split up from him and then died.
She did a bit of charity work (which is practically obligatory for someone in her position) but she didn't die for any cause or anything. Most of the country didn't even seem to like her until she died.
Diana never accomplished anything noteworthy in her life, but to be perfectly fair she was never really meant to. She was plucked at a young age to play a very specific and peculiar role and in this capacity she did about as well as can be expected - producing an acceptable heir to the throne and acting as a modern and glamorous counterpoint to the typically stodgy and conservative image of the royal family. And quite frankly, if being beautiful, marrying well, and dying tragically doesn't make one great, then you'd have to disqualify a lot of famous women from the conversation, British or otherwise.
Also, that list is still weird to me even after re-evaluating the legacy of Richard III. I mean, Enoch Powell? Bono is on there and he's not even British. Maybe throw George Washington on there too, at least he was born a British subject.
I went with Shakespeare, but only because Zayn Malik wasn't on the list.
Thom Yorke
Okay, serious answer is Newton.
It's nobody but Arthur Wellesley or Horatio Nelson! Great Britons and great men.