View Poll Results: Who is the GREATEST BRITON?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • ALAN TURING

    1 3.23%
  • ALFRED the Great

    0 0%
  • ARTHUR WELLESLEY, 1st Duke of Wellington

    1 3.23%
  • CHARLES DARWIN

    7 22.58%
  • Sir CHARLIE CHAPLIN

    0 0%
  • EDWARD JENNER

    1 3.23%
  • ELIZABETH I

    2 6.45%
  • EMMELINE PANKHURST

    0 0%
  • HENRY II

    0 0%
  • HORATIO NELSON, 1st Viscount Nelson

    0 0%
  • Sir ISAAC NEWTON

    5 16.13%
  • ISAMBARD KINGDOM BRUNEL

    0 0%
  • Captain JAMES COOK

    0 0%
  • WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE

    8 25.81%
  • Sir WINSTON CHURCHILL

    6 19.35%
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 61
  1. #31
    Ultimate Member Mister Mets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    19,106

    Default

    I'd go with Shakespeare, arguably the greatest creative mind in world history.

    However, Isambard Kingdom Brunel is a very impressive individual who I know little about.
    Sincerely,
    Thomas Mets

  2. #32
    Ultimate Member Mister Mets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    19,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    There are a lot of impressive individuals on that list, but how the hell did Richard III make it on there? This is a guy whose main claim to fame was usurping the throne by killing his nephews and then losing his kingdom to Henry Tudor two years later. Though to be fair, he did go out like a boss in a glorious yolo charge and came close to killing Henry in single combat before being surrounded, who knows how different history would have been if he had managed to pull that off?
    There's been a reevaulation of Richard the third.

    Josephine Tey's book The Daughter of Time lays out an alternate view of history. And that was a bestseller.

    He did have some nice accomplishments. He made it possible for people who can't afford legal representation to have their grievances heard VIA the couty of requests, banned restrictions on printing/ selling books, improved bail, had the laws translated from French to English, and made the Council of the North part of the legal machinery until 1641.
    Sincerely,
    Thomas Mets

  3. #33
    Invincible Member Kirby101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    20,645

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    There are a lot of impressive individuals on that list, but how the hell did Richard III make it on there? This is a guy whose main claim to fame was usurping the throne by killing his nephews and then losing his kingdom to Henry Tudor two years later. Though to be fair, he did go out like a boss in a glorious yolo charge and came close to killing Henry in single combat before being surrounded, who knows how different history would have been if he had managed to pull that off?
    If he just had a horse.

  4. #34
    CBR's Good Fairy Kieran_Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    8,499

    Default

    I voted for Alan Turing. I think all of them are amazing, but I felt he needed a vote (and always good to support one of the greatest LGBT people ever born). There are few people that we can point to and say "without this individual, we would have never won the war"; Turing is one, Churchill is another.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Mets View Post
    I'd go with Shakespeare, arguably the greatest creative mind in world history.
    However, Isambard Kingdom Brunel is a very impressive individual who I know little about.
    I'm from Bristol; we're all schooled on his epicness from early on. Spent a lot of my childhood being driven over his Suspension Bridge.

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    There are a lot of impressive individuals on that list, but how the hell did Richard III make it on there? This is a guy whose main claim to fame was usurping the throne by killing his nephews and then losing his kingdom to Henry Tudor two years later. Though to be fair, he did go out like a boss in a glorious yolo charge and came close to killing Henry in single combat before being surrounded, who knows how different history would have been if he had managed to pull that off?
    Never get your history from Shakespeare Richard III was actually a very good king, he was a major contributor to the Council of the North. He did a lot of good; and a lot of laws that we still have today he in-acted/founded the original context. Sadly he was beaten by Henry Tudor, (i.e. Elizabeth I's ancestor); so obviously Shakespeare was going to make him the hero, and Richard the "villain".
    "We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."

  5. #35
    Invincible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    20,057

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don C View Post
    Is that a joke? I mean, all the other people in your post are Brits. I can't tell if you're joking or genuinely don't know that Angus Young is from Australia.
    I was joking. I know he and AC/DC are from Australia

  6. #36
    Astonishing Member dzub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,546

    Default

    I voted for Churchill..
    Goldenballs is my favourite living Brit though
    What we used to call life has very little worth these days. Welcome to the very edge.
    --Prince Namor (Earth-616)

  7. #37
    Surfing With The Alien Spike-X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,578

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don C View Post
    Is that a joke? I mean, all the other people in your post are Brits. I can't tell if you're joking or genuinely don't know that Angus Young is from Australia.
    I can't tell if you're joking or genuinely don't know that Angus Young is from Scotland.

  8. #38
    Astonishing Member dancj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Storm View Post
    Why is Diana on that list and so far to the top? Since when did being a martyr make you great? (*cough*Jesus*cough*) I mean how does it make her the greatest example of Britain?
    She's not even a martyr. She's just someone who married someone famous, had an affair (which I don't blame her for, split up from him and then died.

    She did a bit of charity work (which is practically obligatory for someone in her position) but she didn't die for any cause or anything. Most of the country didn't even seem to like her until she died.

  9. #39
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dancj View Post
    She's not even a martyr. She's just someone who married someone famous, had an affair (which I don't blame her for, split up from him and then died.

    She did a bit of charity work (which is practically obligatory for someone in her position) but she didn't die for any cause or anything. Most of the country didn't even seem to like her until she died.
    Diana never accomplished anything noteworthy in her life, but to be perfectly fair she was never really meant to. She was plucked at a young age to play a very specific and peculiar role and in this capacity she did about as well as can be expected - producing an acceptable heir to the throne and acting as a modern and glamorous counterpoint to the typically stodgy and conservative image of the royal family. And quite frankly, if being beautiful, marrying well, and dying tragically doesn't make one great, then you'd have to disqualify a lot of famous women from the conversation, British or otherwise.

    Also, that list is still weird to me even after re-evaluating the legacy of Richard III. I mean, Enoch Powell? Bono is on there and he's not even British. Maybe throw George Washington on there too, at least he was born a British subject.

  10. #40
    Relaunched, not rebooted! SJNeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    San Jose, CA USA
    Posts
    6,612

    Default

    I went with Shakespeare, but only because Zayn Malik wasn't on the list.
    SJNeal
    Veteran Member
    Aug 2009
    7,869

    The CBR Community STANDARDS & RULES

  11. #41
    Astonishing Member dzub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,546

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SJNeal View Post
    I went with Shakespeare, but only because Zayn Malik wasn't on the list.
    he does'nt even have a band anymore *fighting words*

    nah but what you think is one the cards for him? going solo like beyonce and justin timberlake?
    What we used to call life has very little worth these days. Welcome to the very edge.
    --Prince Namor (Earth-616)

  12. #42
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,694

    Default

    Thom Yorke

    Okay, serious answer is Newton.


  13. #43
    Relaunched, not rebooted! SJNeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    San Jose, CA USA
    Posts
    6,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dzub View Post
    he does'nt even have a band anymore *fighting words*

    nah but what you think is one the cards for him? going solo like beyonce and justin timberlake?
    I was actually being sarcastic.

    I couldn't care less where he lands, as there will be a dozen more like him (and the "band" that spawned him) cranked out by the industry in the next few years.
    SJNeal
    Veteran Member
    Aug 2009
    7,869

    The CBR Community STANDARDS & RULES

  14. #44
    Astonishing Member PretenderNX01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PwrdOn View Post
    Diana never accomplished anything noteworthy in her life, but to be perfectly fair she was never really meant to. She was plucked at a young age to play a very specific and peculiar role and in this capacity she did about as well as can be expected - producing an acceptable heir to the throne and acting as a modern and glamorous counterpoint to the typically stodgy and conservative image of the royal family. And quite frankly, if being beautiful, marrying well, and dying tragically doesn't make one great, then you'd have to disqualify a lot of famous women from the conversation, British or otherwise.
    I suppose it's not an "accomplishment" but her being willing to sit with and even touch people with HIV/AIDs went a long way in demystifying the disease and allowing people with it to not be outcast as much.

  15. #45
    Mind Sculptor weezer17's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Earth-616
    Posts
    884

    Default

    It's nobody but Arthur Wellesley or Horatio Nelson! Great Britons and great men.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •