Aside from a lone issue of "Batman," Diamond's top ten in April consisted solely of "Convergence" and "Star Wars" titles.
Full article here.
Aside from a lone issue of "Batman," Diamond's top ten in April consisted solely of "Convergence" and "Star Wars" titles.
Full article here.
I swear... I've heard more doom and gloom from retailers about the "doom and gloom" sales of Convergence... I was not expecting these figures.
My store has a separate box, rack, and area for Convergence stuff.
Its nice for people that want to get them. Easy to find. It's also nice for people (like me) who want to avoid it.
"Always listen to the crazy scientist with a weird van or armful of blueprints and diagrams." -- Vibranium
According to something I read elsewhere, the main Convergence series was fully returnable for retailers and they received a discount if they matched their Batman 31 numbers. Naturally, this would cause retailers to order high. The tie-in books were not returnable, although they did get discounts for matching Superman 34 numbers.
Wow! Star Wars is the most popular brand from Marvel. Not Avengers nor X-men anymore.
I think it's a huge disappointment that Convergence didn't take the top spot, especially when you think that the top spot book (Star Wars) is just a regular issue (#4) , not a debut.
The new Star Wars trailer hit in April so that may also have helped the SW book sales.
Kinda interesting to see a top ten with so few titles that would have been recognizable months ago.
Right now, we're looking at Star Wars sales four months into the relaunch when the line is limited, and generally has A-list talent on each book. It's rather top-heavy, and sales are unlikely to be as high in the future.
An advantage of the X-books and Avengers titles is the amount of content Marvel can publish. Although it is interesting to imagine what would happen if Marvel had limited of one X-book a week.
Also, the sales of the main book aren't necessarily going to mean anything about the sales of the tie-ins.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets