Originally Posted by
t hedge coke
Batman was "allowing the cycle to continue" every time he let Talia kill, steal, use, abuse, and cheat however she pleased. And he always let her. He always let her walk away. He was always willing to shrug his shoulders and content himself with preventing her from murdering right in front of him. But, if she said, "Oh, I was going to murder this guy, but now that you're here and he's dead, I'll just steal his stuff..."
Same with Catwoman, who he continually stopped from stealing in front of him, but rarely prevented from breaking and entering, sometimes used her specifically for b&e, never worried about her history of assaults, her undoubtedly being wanted for criminal activity, or any of that. No, as long as she doesn't commit an egregious crime (that is, one he cares about) in front of him, well... she is a woman after all.
Batman, GL, Superman, Wonder Woman are all shortsighted in their ways. It's the nature of repeat villain stories and limited dynamics, and that's fine. But even "retaining" his "morals," Batman actually being left in charge with no one countering him, with no balances, is nuts and kinda terrifying.
Remember how Batman found Mr. Unknown? He tracked him down, violating his privacy on base levels, not because he did anything wrong, or was suspected of anything wrong, but because Batman wanted to.
Most of what Batman does is self-indulgent. Superheroing, by its nature, is self-indulgent. It's part of what makes it fun to read about.